Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Having also just tested it at no point was I able to recreate a situation where the m1 shot 2.5 seconds earlier than the Rak. Nothing even close to that
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Have a nice look at the AT gun on the left aiming straight ahead and the shot curving into the Puma that's on the edge of the cone as soon as it sets up.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
The setup looked bugged. Like the yellow bar that appears when team weapons setup was delayed. The yellow bar appeared after it was already setup
And that's still a lot more than .5 seconds for setup and firing
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Btw this animation bug is what I was talking about, it exists but isn't exactly what I thought it was.
Posts: 888
I don't like that it can still retreat but that would maybe be too drastic a nerf. Rate of fire OR penetration like you said is probably a good idea
Posts: 13
Posts: 281
Posts: 570 | Subs: 1
Posts: 19
And like I said, none of those stats matter. Can u read? I said "don't get technical with me." The only stat that matters is TIME TO KILL. Put any stock allied medium in the range of a pak and a raketen. I dare you to tell me that the pak will kill the tank faster than the rak.
That's a shame. What about changing the crew to have a smaller size modifier so they are slightly harder to hit/insta decrew?
Are you able to fix the bug where you cant allow the Rak to move when cloaked (ie have it decloak, move, recloak) like camo'd ZIS/Paks can?
Posts: 155
Posts: 1351
Posts: 1954
Yeah I've seen this before too but its still taking 2-3 seconds to fire from the start of setup to the shot
Should be said that the 57 has the widest cone too. So when a bug like that occurs it looks extra weird
 |
|
|
68 | ||
 |
|
|
39 | ||
|
|
|
|
36 | ||
 |
|
|
103 | ||
|
|
|
|
25 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
