Mines should give XP to the squad who planted them
16 Feb 2020, 05:19 AM
#1
Posts: 3053
Would be a nice way to actually vet engineers that don't have flamers or handheld AT past 1 minute. It was a thing in coh1 too.
 | Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
16 Feb 2020, 11:03 AM
#2
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
Or shared experience around vehicles.
16 Feb 2020, 11:16 AM
#3
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
+1
16 Feb 2020, 11:18 AM
#4
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
All structure that have a cost could provide the builder with XP on completion
16 Feb 2020, 11:26 AM
#5
Posts: 268
This would mostly benefit the russian engs, UKF engs and sturmpio. Rear echelons cant place mines non doctrinal. German minefields arnt reliable, since the enemy sees them from far; tank mines are often a gambit.
Would this count for main line inf as well, when they can place doctrinal mines?
Would this count for main line inf as well, when they can place doctrinal mines?
16 Feb 2020, 11:44 AM
#6
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
This would mostly benefit the russian engs, UKF engs and sturmpio. Rear echelons cant place mines non doctrinal. German minefields arnt reliable, since the enemy sees them from far; tank mines are often a gambit.
Would this count for main line inf as well, when they can place doctrinal mines?
R.E. can place mines without a doctrine for quite some time now...
16 Feb 2020, 11:45 AM
#7
Posts: 268
R.E. can place mines without a doctrine for quite some time now...
my bad; youmean those anti tank mines? I am not that familiar with them; thought it was doctrinal
16 Feb 2020, 11:45 AM
#8
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
Experience on sweeping mines is better or you could just farm vet 2 engineers if you're floating munitions in the late game.
16 Feb 2020, 11:50 AM
#9
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
my bad; youmean those anti tank mines? I am not that familiar with them; thought it was doctrinal
No problem we all make mistakes
.
16 Feb 2020, 11:50 AM
#10
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
my bad; youmean those anti tank mines? I am not that familiar with them; thought it was doctrinal
No one is, that's how irrelevant they are.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
16 Feb 2020, 12:55 PM
#11
Posts: 1392
Experience on sweeping mines is better or you could just farm vet 2 engineers if you're floating munitions in the late game.
I want that since years, but it seems most people arn't interested.
Also Ostheer's AI mine should be a field, also no shields.
16 Feb 2020, 13:53 PM
#12
Posts: 731
Agree
16 Feb 2020, 14:28 PM
#13
Posts: 129
Maybe it could be locked out by flamethrower/AT upgrade, or at least put behind minesweeper upgrade
16 Feb 2020, 15:43 PM
#14
Posts: 3053
All structure that have a cost could provide the builder with XP on completion
That would disproportionately benefit EFA, especially ostheer, but honestly that probably wouldn't be an issue since WFA can have handheld AT on their engineers and vetting them has never been a serious issue.
This would mostly benefit the russian engs, UKF engs and sturmpio. Rear echelons cant place mines non doctrinal. German minefields arnt reliable, since the enemy sees them from far; tank mines are often a gambit.
Would this count for main line inf as well, when they can place doctrinal mines?
As others said, rear echelons do have mines, and ostheer pios would probably get a huge amount of XP from even infrequent teller hits, and on the off chance somebody goes through an s-mine field, you'd be getting XP too, and some is better than none.
Experience on sweeping mines is better or you could just farm vet 2 engineers if you're floating munitions in the late game.
Why not both? And engineers (minesweepers especially) should be able to vet in the lategame, because currently this is functionally not possible without them having handheld AT (which isn't even an option for a majority of factions' engineers).
Maybe it could be locked out by flamethrower/AT upgrade, or at least put behind minesweeper upgrade
Probably should be locked behind sweeper upgrade.
| Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
16 Feb 2020, 17:11 PM
#15
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
That would disproportionately benefit EFA, especially ostheer, but honestly that probably wouldn't be an issue since WFA can have handheld AT on their engineers and vetting them has never been a serious issue.
I don't see how, soviet build at lest 3 buildings, cashes and mines, R.E have mines/fighting position cashes, Ro.E. have mines, cashes and emplacements, okw have mines (and some doctrinal stuff).
The least benefit would come to OKW.
16 Feb 2020, 22:24 PM
#16
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
All structure that have a cost could provide the builder with XP on completion
I would leave base structures out of the equation and probably other units which already have a popcap (artillery).
I would combine this with engineers destroying enemy wire and disabling mines.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
98 | ||
 |
|
|
34 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
144 | ||
|
|
|
|
30 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
846 users are online:
846 guests
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49120
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM