Do I have to make it that specific if we all already know what that is. Your just being Jerk right now.
The point is HVAP has great Pen but horrific reload, so you can’t compare the HVAP M36 with the su85.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Do I have to make it that specific if we all already know what that is. Your just being Jerk right now.
Posts: 1563
The point is HVAP has great Pen but horrific reload, so you can’t compare the HVAP M36 with the su85.
Posts: 3260
Dude It's never gonna bounce Jacksons. Hell vet ap Jacksons have a pen like ~400 enough to even pierce a ele.
But SU85's have a pen of 286 equal to panthers vet3 armor. Atleast bouncing su85's would be nice.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
A Vet 3 Jackson has a far penetration of 286.
The Jackson's AP rounds ability is specifically for penetrating the armour of ultraheavy vehicles. It was designed to go up against the 525 armour Jagdtiger.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
The point is HVAP has great Pen but horrific reload, so you can’t compare the HVAP M36 with the su85.
Posts: 3260
No, because the JT should not get penetrated by super mobile 145 fuel non-doctrinal TDs that have almost the same range. Right now two Jacksons can casually drive up to a JT and kill it from the front without breaking a sweat. JT is meant to hard counter allied 60 range TDs and only die from getting flanked or stunned and bombed with an off-map.
Jackson Vet 3 with HVAP has 390 penetration from range 0-30 so when he said roughly 400 penetration it wasn't really wrong.
Posts: 2358
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2358
Posts: 1563
I like the idea too, more armor means more rng. Acc is a useful buff for an average speed shooter like phanter.
But I would love to see a vet3 range buff.
Posts: 2358
Range 55 panther. Fuck one Fuck all ze allied Tanks.
Hans:"wait I thought Panthers already do that".
Posts: 960
I would rather it get better accuracy with vet
Posts: 789
Yeah then hull down 75(yes 60*1.25=75 range dude 75!!!!) range panthers gonna come and ruin every allied tank on the planet.
Posts: 868 | Subs: 5
Yeah but it's far more expensive compared to TD's so why should it not be able deflect max range shots from TD's when it's vet3???? Huh buddy???
Posts: 647
Posts: 1563
I think vet 3 allied infantry should be 100% immune to vet 3 MG42 / Vet 5 OKW FLAK AA truck.
100% immune to both dmg AND suppression. Should bouncing all bullets.
Because units should always be immune to their counters.
Especially core non-commander units. Don't you agree?
Making Panthers immune to AT would mean they're immune to any counter.
Posts: 3260
So I thinks stugs and JP4 should have their long ranges pens increased to 290 to facilitate your ideal vision for the game. See as comets/churches are "Immune" to their counters.
Posts: 1563
Double StuG (about the same cost as a Panther) butchers Churchills.
Comets do not do well against Panthers.
My opinion on the 230 FU heavies is pretty well known, but I think nondoc heavies (Panther and the UKF ones) are all balanced really nicely.
I'd have no problem if the Tiger, Pershing, and IS-2 were rebalanced to be like the Comet.
Posts: 1794
Posts: 3260
Panther is almost a doctrine Pershing with a bit lesser AI for longer range.
24 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
358 | |||||
7 | |||||
5 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 |