Posts: 3032 | Subs: 3
All this talk about pyro section sight range, meanwhile USF IR Pathfinder + Bar Blob is fine?
Posts: 1794
Infantry sections's sight bonus dont light up behind the enemy's frontline and can totally be counterable by attacking the unit. It's not event that funny to compare sight bounus on an infantry unit with the recon flare.
i dont know whichs "long range arty" you are talking about but Axis have nondoc superheavy with 300+ amour, rememer ?
And, one of two axis factions also have stock 60 range TD of their owns.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Ukf have the same light up behind recon flare no? Was it nerfed along with spec ops?
Ukf already can put sight on the vehicles with tank commander.
Jp4 is not as good sadly.
Please remove KT from non-doc. Im totally for it if 60Td gets nerfed.
KT is not even good these days because of nerfed AI.
Come on, lets be fair, do you really have problem dealing with present KT? Why keep using it as justification?
Long range arty like base arty, land mattress. In team 2v2 games, the pyro will now provide good sight to mortar pits, katty, scotts, pak howie, B4. I havent even come into 60Td benefits, which im sure you can feel it.
pyro can stay in the fight unlike pio.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1794
http://prntscr.com/qvt1iw
^ seriously with all the additions the inf sections get now, how is this shit fair? Not even a sniper has such a ludicrous sight range.
http://prntscr.com/qvt247
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1794
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
Requoting this. This is absurd.
How come such buffed sight is not stated in the notes?
I would have scratched my heads if this gone live, with no idea why my units are spotted.
Is this a bug or another stealth buff?
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
To repeat what has already been said, seing as you love pointless repetition so much:
Snipers have 45 sight range
Pyro Sections have 42 sight range
Other recon squads like JLI or Pathfinders have 50 sight range.
Snipers with veterancy permanently have 54 sight range
Pyro Sections with veterancy have 52 sight range and only in cover
They're on curve.
 | Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
Let’s play a game: spot the mainline infantry
Posts: 1794
To repeat what has already been said, seing as you love pointless repetition so much:
Snipers have 45 sight range
Pyro Sections have 42 sight range
Other recon squads like JLI or Pathfinders have 50 sight range.
Snipers with veterancy permanently have 54 sight range
Pyro Sections with veterancy have 52 sight range and only in cover
They're on curve.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Oh, oh, I know this one! It's Panzerfusilliers!
Not every army is exactly the same and pyro sections are one of the UKF's two spotting options. No army lacks them.
| Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Requoting this. This is absurd.
How come such buffed sight is not stated in the notes?
I would have scratched my heads if this gone live, with no idea why my units are spotted.
Is this a bug or another stealth buff?
Posts: 591 | Subs: 1
Let’s play a game: spot the mainline infantry
Now another game: Spot the infantry that can build a trench for its MG with extra vet 1 range
Now another game: spot the infantry that can call in cheap smoke
Now another game: spot the infantry that just got 0.2 moving accuracy modifier buff
Got your answer? Comment below and win a free trip to 5 star Siberian hotel.
Posts: 1794
It is not listed in the note, because it was always been there from the stat, at least, when i started to play the game more than a year ago, those feature had been there. But you dont know that, cause you dont play UKF.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Oh boy! You get to make a bunch of arbitrary conditions!
Know what Infantry sections don't have?
The longest range snare in the game! By a 4 man squad that can’t build trenches.
The ability to fire flares that provide even longer LoS with no requirement for the squad to remain close by! Ah yes Pfusiliers which can’t build defenses, heal on the move, call in arty, call in smoke and don’t have an MG with absurd vet 1 range in buildings
Already had prefectly acceptable moving accuracy with no need for a buff! And beat the crap out of every mainline in cover, though I do agree with the buff, but it’s more of a sweetener than a necessary buff
Get a grenade without needing side tech! Volks have no grenades and Grens have a long range rifle nade with huge wind up
Just listing things that the infantry section can do is asenine. Don’t be a dumbass, listing all the great things Sections can do paints the whole picture of why their absurd sight is a huge issue in this context.
It's not an argument, it's just pitiful complaining. Funny, that’s what you’re doing.
| Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Ok thats fair. I dont research enough ukf. I do play them in 4v4.
So ukf pyro always have such amazing sight?
Allies better stop talking about pio 42 sight from now on.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Pio 42 sight range come free in a cheap squad and combine perfectly with the early power of the mg42.
And event when pyro is that "amazing", it still cant outweigh the healing upgrade. So you dont see that much pyro section around.
| Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
It can’t be that difficult to understand Pyro Sections can do a bunch of things and fight at the front, while Pioneers can’t and have to repair most of the time.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Chill, mate, it's not like i'm complaining about pio, and i'm suggesting torn down pyro sight range, am i ?
| Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
 |
|
|
71 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
92 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
