Posts: 857 | Subs: 2
If tournament results are any indication, the Balance Team has done an incredibly good job on making a balanced and strategically diverse Ostheer.
Posts: 1794
Posts: 1351
Posts: 1794
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
I mean Panther is so expensive to counter IS2
Posts: 1794
Do elaborate how a 185 fuel vehicle is expensive compared to a 230 fuel vehicle.
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Von had a good start with 5 man Wehr choice, but got overpowered by Sov tanks...
Posts: 1351
Von had the game won, then threw it away by going Pwerfer. Had he gone StuGG&Ostwin or Brummbar and Pak he’d have won easily.
Please stop making balance complaints when you can’t even understand what you’re looking at.
Posts: 379 | Subs: 1
Posts: 528 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1794
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Tbf his wafer did a good job and worth the investment.
Posts: 379 | Subs: 1
he went t4 for pwerfer and then spammed stugs vs is2 lol.
Posts: 1351
Posts: 1794
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
Posts: 1351
Stug vs IS-2 is like trying to kill a Tiger with SU76s. You can do it, and the stug will be more successful than the su76, but there are better tools for the job.
Posts: 1351
Just slightly revamp T3/T4 cost:
T3 tech: 105 fuel
T3 building: 0 fuel
T4 tech: 35 fuel
T4 building: 0 fuel
Going straight for T3 would cost the same as now, as would going straight to T4, but going for T3 first then T4 would be slightly more affordable. This would make T3 into T4 more affordable in 1v1, but keep the same balance in 2v2 (where T3 is often skipped).
Some doctrinal options would need their timing/performance adjusted, like Stug E and Puma.
Posts: 1614 | Subs: 3
I'd rather reduce the cost of the panther and brumbar. But Your option would also make sense - I just feel that ppl seeing no fuel for something Wehr gets might go really wild.
 |
|
|
20 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
239 | ||
 |
|
|
27 | ||
|
|
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
