data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/830ca/830cae27a0df30579d870c40dd9bfc2fae0e4176" alt=":thumb: :thumb:"
And well done also, to our new sub-editors!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecfe2/ecfe2613eb6afd4b4388b8d76da1403b9fb07925" alt=":) :)"
Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9
Posts: 732
Posts: 22
Posts: 1617
Posts: 1157 | Subs: 2
Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Posts: 881
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Nice guide!
And we know everyone hates deep snow and blizzards, but what about ice as seen on Semoskiya Winter and Bystraya? Iirc Semoskiya Winter was played in OCF too.
Posts: 881
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2819
Posts: 86
Posts: 480 | Subs: 1
Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
I would also mention the absence of bridges.
I guess competitive players don't like things that can decrease the mobility of their army; like water, snow, bridges...
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
I'm just wondering why all the most played maps are summer maps, when imo winter terrain only bring new options on the table; of which only ice remain, since deep snow and blizzards have been removed. Is ice just as bad?
I.e. water is now not a blocker or red cover, but passable terrain, only more dangerous for vehicles; a feature actually not used in many maps.
Is there simply no good winter maps or do people just not like the cold?
Posts: 71
Posts: 881
Posts: 243