Profile of Australian Magic

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198105012992


Thread: Let's Talk: ISG Performance19 Jul 2016, 08:21 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2016, 08:20 AMBrassatko I'd like to see that replay. Maybe there is ab bit more to it than just ISGs hammering the poor 120s and maxims into the ground? So in fact the ISG is so strong it needs to be nerfed quite a bit in your opinion? Where did I say that it needs a nerf? I said it's fine. Look for it in recent Dane's replays. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's Talk: ISG Performance19 Jul 2016, 08:04 AM Just 2 days ago I watched Luvnet vs Zarok. Luv went for 2 ISGs to counter maxims, and Zarok for 2 120s to counter ISGs. Guess who won? ISGs or 120s? 120s had no chance. Let's keep in mind that ISG is really, really accurate and it bases damage not on AoE but on accuracy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF morta has Laser-target aiming and follow-mechanic18 Jul 2016, 11:04 AM Gosh... How many threads like this? Are you blind adn you cannot see XX similar threads? In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Too much artillery?18 Jul 2016, 08:14 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2016, 01:12 AMeasierwithaturret He's kinda right though, ISG is still useful against emplacements due to its range but it is lackluster against infantry. In the mid game that manpower is usually better spend on another infantry squad. If you're back teching to med truck then it has little use in the late game. Pack howitzer is irrelevant since USF got mortar, I haven't seen a single one since then. Even before it was a clumsy RNG cannon with a crap barrage. Instead of being used in its intended role of attacking bunkers, garrisons and OKW trucks its main value was in cheese wipes on Grenadier squads. If pack howi had more range and less AOE it would better perform its role with less annoying instagibs on axis players. Then you should try to use them or watch some 1v1 replays instead of spreaging bullshit. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: t34/85 is a bit too cheap17 Jul 2016, 22:26 PM I see only one problem with T35/85. First one is very expensive but as the game moves on over 30-40min it becomes too cheap. 140-145F would be a fair price. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: on the ptrs17 Jul 2016, 21:51 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2016, 21:37 PMFiresparks their 1.5 armor also make the one of the toughest infantry squad in the game. It's got a six men squad with one of the highest defensive modifier in the game. I wouldn't call them the toughest. Sure, at vet 0 they are but as the game moves on, armor becomes obsolete. HMGs have penetration over 1.5 so it's useless against them, useless against mounted HMGs on tanks and in mid-late game it's better to have lowe rec. acc. than armor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF didn't need a mortar.17 Jul 2016, 14:44 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2016, 14:06 PMEsxile Play Ostheer 10 games. Really It will change your mind. Well, you can always skip HMG and go for triple/quadrople Grens to stay mobile and outnumber USF who went for mortar. But that's just a theory In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su-85 needs high pop cost17 Jul 2016, 13:40 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2016, 13:18 PMStug life Ff is 160 at vet 3 240 That's why I asked. Nevertheless it has turret, tullips. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: su-85 needs high pop cost17 Jul 2016, 09:51 AM Someone could say that it was a nerf, not a buff.. Jackson and FF have 200damage (FF has 200, right?) + turret. JPIV has armor and bonus HP and camo. SU85 has only sight but that's hardly bonus since JP with vet 2 also has it without any penalties In: COH2 Balance
Thread: on the ptrs17 Jul 2016, 09:48 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2016, 09:46 AMStug life ....... They cost 330 ........ My bad. I was thinking about something else and writing something else. In: COH2 Balance