Profile of Australian Magic

Now ISU is what it should be from beggining. Great armor, better against tanks. One word - BEAST!
Complaing about how ISU is OP in 3...2...1...
Now soviets have really good late-game AT unit, so like someone before me said, adapt to this situation!
We all know that people playing as germans wish to fight against SU-85, T34-85 in late-game using theirs Tigers, Panthers, Elephants. Now when ISU can counter those units they are complaing that it shouldnt be good AI and AT at the same time. You had late-game addvantage since release, so now lets gove soviets some fun. We know you what to keep things easy (Panthers spam, Tigers+PGrens = end game) but now you have to think and try to flank rather than going straight ahead.
Yesterday I had epic battle. 4v4 (4 germans from the same clan). After 40min it became haevy units battle. Tigers+Elephants+Panters vs Shermans+Sus85+my ISUs. I lost 5 of them but still killed 1 elephant, 5 panthers, 4 tigers and countless inf! At last we have something we can use against those germans haevy vehicles.
Before patch it was hard to make a scratch on Tiger. Now germans will think twice before attack.

PS
When you were using Panthers, it was alright to spam them (winning, right?) Now when Soviets have something really good it's bad because you cant simply spam panthers and smash everything

I try to use mortars if snipers are without clown car, but if they hvae I have no ******* idea.
Few times I successfully flanked them by Pgrens with schrecks but I had to go almost around whole map.
Also try to use this air strike which stun inf and go through cons with Pz4 or SdKfz.

I meant that at the beggining you need to stay together.
There cannot be situation when 1 of you is facing 2 of them. For example, City 4v4, 2 go left for fuel, 2 go right for fuel and from 4v4 it becames 1 game 2v2 in the left, and 1 game 2v2 on the right.

Atm I use Panther, Brrumbar, Panther (in that order).
Panther has less hp than a Tiger and worse armor so destroying base is little more difficult because you need to escape from there (if there is any resistance) faster, before you destroy everything.

Stug can be use very effective in late game because of (idk how that ability is named in english) ability to stun russians vehi. You dont need to go close with gren and use pfaust. Just shoot from far distance with stug and you have few sec when russians tank cannont do anything.
Pak 40/43/Brrumbar/Elefant have the same ability but I guess Stug is the best option to use it.

1. Stug has better penetration and range so they are better against tanks, but Pz4 cannot be flanked, better armor and more hp.
2. It depends. If you spam Pz4 you must be sure you will push soviets very deep. If you do, wait for a Tiger. I used to play this way for a very long time. Once I even killed 146 units by 1 Pz4 so they can be very effecvite.
3. Plant mines, get vet 1 to escape from ram, always keep Pak40 or Pgrens with schrecks close to Pz4/Stug/whatever to make sure t34 wont reach your tank. I mean you have to destroy it before. You can also hide behind buildings, and never stand in front of t34.
4. Keep engi close, put mines around, kill mortars.
5. No answer.
6. So... ?
7. Hmmm from 4v4 make 2 games 2v2. I mean, leave useless point and focus on main points.
8. It depends. I used to use Pz 4 (2-3) and wait for Tiger. Now I use Panther cause I can call for Brrumbar as well, which is very effective against inf spam.
9. You need to find your own strategy which suits you best.

The Osttruppen Doctrine commander also has that ability, Redistribute Resources.

But Osttruppen doctrine sucks
I think this ability + Tiger would be cool.

Btw wonder when Relic will make something like "Make your own doctrine" and each ability for 3$... :/