Profile of Australian Magic

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198105012992


Thread: Personal CoH2 feedback1 Jan 2015, 16:49 PM My bad, I stopped at last point. In: Lobby
Thread: Personal CoH2 feedback1 Jan 2015, 16:31 PM Why only about Axis? I don't agree with sniper part. I saw a lot o replays (1v1/2v2) where sniper had 30-50 kills. I would add to wishlist Flak 88 as doctrinal AA&AT unit for Ostheer. In: Lobby
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs1 Jan 2015, 16:09 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2015, 16:00 PMJaigen Allies have the better medium and AI tanks the axis the okw (not ostheer) have better TD. not that the okw has any mediums tanks safe callins. the allies medium tanks do struggle against dedicated TD's but at the same if your tanks get wiped out you still have a chance to recover as the TD can do nothing to your infantry. p.s. : l2p if you ar elosing you vehicles no shreks/puchpen. So Allied tanks that should destory Axis inf are countered by Axis tanks which are countered only by micro-intensive spam? Seems fair Im still waiting for your pro replay. Please show me one where you are not losing flanking Jackson due to schrecks blob. Im waiting for that! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Forward Headquarters broken?1 Jan 2015, 15:13 PM It's ok. The problem is about some buildings. For example, this huge building in the middle of Ettebruck can stand more than 2 Stuka barrages In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs1 Jan 2015, 14:35 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2015, 13:55 PMminimitmit I checked your playercard and saw that you should not talk about balance, sorry. Listen to higher skilled players. Ask for example ciez, who plays both sides in 2v2 AT. Said guy who has played 98 as Soviets & 18 as USF vs 230 as OKW (I see you have troubles with 4v4 as OKW)& 242 as OST And what about AT games? Axis all day long And Im the one who play one faction _____________ So You are denying mu statement that OKW nad OST have better and more AT late-game options? So you want to say that units with 380, 440 and 550 penetration are useless? B4 is easily countered by off map so I think B4 it's not any issue at all. Try to use 3 Jacksons at once of map with many building or forest. Try to flank King Tiger, kill it and escape before schrecks wreck you. I assure you that due to shit pathfinding, low hp and useless armor you will lose you Jackson on such maps, unless you face enemy who does not keep Pak/Raketen/Schreck close to monster units. IS2+Jackson are useless against decent opponent if they face Elephant or Jadgtiger. By the way, Elephnat is amazing unit. It's a great game-breaker unit but still not OP. Major, Sir, please be like football referee who likes sometimes aggressive football so he does not show yellow/red cards for small tackles In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs1 Jan 2015, 13:09 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2015, 12:31 PMminimitmit Zis has 10 less Pen than pak. You count on that? Tiger has 300 armor at the same cost. Kt is not an issue. It is slow as fuck, especially the turret, and costs a fortune+ teching costs. It is basically a slower Is2 with a better gun. Also Axis units do NOT have that much more penetration. As I said 10 more on the ATG, but a lot less on the tiger compared to IS2. Try Elephant yourself. It is pretty bad since its like a mobile pak43 that costs a lot of fuel and is too slow, especial rotating. OKW has a crappy atgun. Only problem is the shreckblob lategame here. Pak43 is easily countered by offmap, so this is utter bullshit. Panther has weak AI while IS2 is an allrounder. Stop being biased and play both factions and you will understand. In 2v2 and up Allies have the upper hand in higher skilled dimensions. I agree that axis are easier to a move than allies, but if you can not micro your jacksons with is2s in front then you suck ,sorry. Check my playcard and say one more time Im nor playing both factions So, OKW and OST have non-doc Panthers, schrecks, King Tiger, 2 useful doctrines with Elephant, Jadgtiger and few doctrines with Pak43. What Allies have? 1 useful doctrine with IS2, 2 doctrines with ISU which no one uses right now, RNG Jackson and shitty zooks. Pak40 is a way better than ZiS. So Allies have worse AT option and yet have to face better tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Axis heavy armor needs nerf or Allied AT needs buffs1 Jan 2015, 12:21 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Jan 2015, 12:16 PMminimitmit Kt has 400 armor. Is 2 375. So what exactly did you try to say there? I don't know... Maybe he wanted to say that Soviets has only 2 units with penetration over 200 (both doctrinal) while Axis has more options with a way better penetration so 375 is no big deal for Elephant, Jadgtiger, Pak43 or even Panther, while 425 of King Tiger is really pain on the ass for Soviets, not to metion USF... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Howitzer Tank Overperforming1 Jan 2015, 09:33 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Dec 2014, 23:42 PMCieZ Are we really comparing an 80 fuel tank to a 260 fuel tank that requires EVERY truck to be built in order to build? Might as well compare the Stug E to the Is-2 while we're at it... Of course the KT is a better tank than a Scott on an individual basis - it costs like 5 times as much. But 4-5 Scotts is going to bleed a hell of a lot more than a single KT. Not that I'd ever have 5 scotts on the field at the same time... but the thought experiment sticks. The Scott is just too strong for its current cost. Plus the ability it has to shoot over every shot blocker makes it crazy hard to deal with on some maps. It's a cool feature, don't get me wrong... but it is too brutal on maps like Semos/Vaux. Maybe there's a way to reduce accuracy when it is lobbing shots over buildings and stuff? You yoursefl mentioned ISU (but not KT, I just wonder why). Of course KT is a way more expensive, that's why it wipes everything, has nice reload duration, armor, turret, penetration... Everything. One-unit army. You need 120 fuel to unlock KT but how many fuel you need to unlock M8? 140 or... 170! and 13 pop cap.... I think I would hesitate between M8 and Stuka if I could choose. I was watching yesterday stream of Romeo. He made M8 and was missing all the time ^^ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Isu-152 overnerfed?1 Jan 2015, 08:53 AM ISU is fine. Tried it few days ago in 2v2. Over 50kills and its really good against Tigers. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Howitzer Tank Overperforming31 Dec 2014, 18:47 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Dec 2014, 17:17 PMCieZ M8 Scott has been OP for a long time. I think the only unit that squad wiped more than this was the old ISU... maybe the 120mm mortar. Because King Tiger is not wiping everything Huge AoE, nice scatter, amazing armor, reload time a way better than ISU, and turret. In: COH2 Balance