Profile of Cabreza

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 656

General Information


Thread: OST command tank is OP?27 Jul 2015, 04:41 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jul 2015, 22:34 PMAlexzandvar This would effectively remove the unit from the game because the unit itself is only good for it's aura. It should just not work in enemy territory. That's all. Also remember only one of the doctrines it comes with has a heavy tank, most of the rest of them rely on medium and light armor, the buff to it has made the game much more fun because more Ostheer commanders are meta! I'm not saying remove the aura, I'm saying that IF the aura is too strong in enemy territory then the best way to approach the solution would be to reduce the strength of the aura a bit instead of adding a bunch of complicated rules as to when it works and when it doesn't. Keep in mind that nothing has changed about the command tank's main gun so it is still quite decent vs infantry and light vehicles. If the aura was a bit weaker then the main gun could also be a little better or the price of the command P4 could be somewhat cheaper. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OST command tank is OP?26 Jul 2015, 22:28 PM I can't say I've had too much experience with the command tank this patch but it seems to me that if the aura is over-performing now that it works in all territory then it should just be toned down a bit to respect the fact that it is much easier to use. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Please nerf Luchs26 Jul 2015, 22:13 PM The Luchs is fine for a light tank. My only complaint about the unit is that it only costs 50FU while other light tanks cost 70FU but it lacks any real AT capability and if it cost much more it would arrive too late so it kind of needs to cost only 50FU to be useful. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OCF All-Star Game Nominations26 Jul 2015, 21:52 PM 1. Cruzz 2. RedxWings 3. VonIvan In: Operation Charlie Fox
Thread: Airborne Armor commander26 Jul 2015, 10:23 AM Only if the tanks crush any infantry they land on. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Conscripts need mid-game buff16 Jul 2015, 05:23 AM If we're talking about giving cons late game scaling I've always loved the idea of a squad based (or possibly global) upgrade that increases the Con squad size to 8, decreases their pop cost to .75, decreases reinforce cost to 15, and removes the +7% received accuracy they suffer. That way Con dps doesn't change dramatically but they become a lot more survivable vs late game infantry and with a cheaper reinforce can expect to trade more efficiently. Relic could even attach the frontaviki dialogue to it from the campaign. The alternative is always a global upgrade that unlocks the PPSH upgrade for cons or just tying the PPSH upgrade to T3 or T4. You could also make the upgrade remove the +7% received accuracy penalty as it is only really necessary in the early game when Cons can overpower grens and volks on a 1 for 1 basis. In this instance the PPSH upgrade from commanders could remain in place and act as an additional upgrade, allowing a con squad that buys PPSHs twice to become fully equipped. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: It's not often I post a 1v116 Jul 2015, 04:56 AM I hear this shit be epic. In: Replays
Thread: Update on beta patch by Jason Lee15 Jul 2015, 21:58 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jul 2015, 21:38 PMAlexzandvar They can still block light vehicles and pathing easily, it's just that you can't set em up under fire anymore and they die in a reasonable amount of time like OKW sandbags do. I've always considered OKW sandbags a bit too easy to destroy. Perhaps a middle ground of 250 hp would be better. That way all sandbags could take a couple of shreck, bazooka, or mortar hits before being destroyed. In: Lobby
Thread: At nades in the new workshop beta patch15 Jul 2015, 21:54 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jul 2015, 21:34 PMFestiveLongJohns As it stands now, it only takes a tiny amount of damage in order to bring a tank low enough to damage the engine with a single vehicle snare. If the idea is to allow medium vehicles to effectively push into enemy lines, then the threshold needs to be lowered, because it takes basically nothing to damage a tank enough to AT nade it, and every mediocre player is going to have at least something to damage a tank enough to snare it, even from full health. It really depends on what the change was meant to accomplish. If the change was meant to make tanks on flanks harder to engine crit when they encounter lone infantry squads it is a success as it means a single at snare won't slow down a tank that is far away from support chasing away back capping squads. If it was meant to give tanks the ability to better maneuver in the middle of a major engagement then I agree that it isn't accomplishing enough since in those scenarios there is a lot of AT damage going out that can make tanks fairly easy to snare. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Update on beta patch by Jason Lee15 Jul 2015, 21:01 PM One additional change I'd love to see would be the lowering of the T34/76's pop cap to 10 or 8 to better represent it's new role as an 80 fuel tank. For reference P4s and Shermans are 12 pop, the StugG, Puma, Luchs, T70, and SU76 are 8, and the Ostwind is 10. In: Lobby