Profile of Katitof

Talk's cheap,u being a pro i would like to see u use couple of pzgren squads to pwn usa in tourneys.

"Being spammable and a-moveable" isn't an indicator of units performance you know.

Not every valid unit is spammable.

But then again, we don't talk rank 10.000 and up here.

First is this a average of all the figures?

No. First post for 1v1, 2nd for 2v2(as you have asked for 2v2 by using it first).

Coz u urself said higher than 2 vs 2 don't matter for balance as they can't be balanced..backtracking?

You have felt the need to bring up 2v2.
I have provided best rounded data to bring the picture for people who have hard time with numbers so its impossible to interpret the numbers wrong.
I have rounded 2v2 numbers only because you have used that as argument, so you are arguing yourself here.
2v2 % will be reference point in the following part of my post.

I don't care about OKW as my arguments are concerned with ostheer.Do what u want with them.And do u deny that wehr are nowhere to be seen in top 2.Also least played faction....now answer me directly why does this faction have 1 infantry unit and 1 useable late game tank?Simple question...and how long are we expected to put up with this?

First of all, its % of wins for all factions, not a ladder in itself, doesn't matter what faction is first and what is last as long as they are all relatively close to each other.
In case of 3 factions the difference is 3%, which means almost perfect balance.
In case of 4th, OKW, the difference is twice as big, indicating for a minor balance issue with them being tad too strong somewhere.

Secondly, which faction is played most and which faction is played least have absolutely nothing to do with anything, the data is for top 200 of all 4 factions and as you and others like to chant in the que proportions threads, which faction is being played most or least have nothing to do with balance, but preference. In DoW2 nids were strongest and yet least played.

Thirdly, as it was pointed to you multiple times in a plethora of threads-its all about how you use the unit.
Best players have no problems with it, bad players complain. I'd go with balance opinions of players better then me in this case and say they perform fine, which leads us to the second part-how long will you have to put up with that? Until you learn to properly use them.

Geramn T4 and panzergrenadiers need to be buffed ,and u can't give any reasons why they shouldn't...come straight to point..why are u opposing german t4 and pz gren buff idea knowing they are completely extinct units?
Only one answer-complete soviet bias.You want to on purpose keep wehr a 1 infantry,1 tank crippled faction.

Pgrens perform fine.
T4 units perform fine.
Getting to T4 is the part that is not fine.
As opposed to you, I actually play all 4 factions, I don't give a shit about bias, I have a prefference of a playstyle, but since I play all of them I want equal chances with all of them.

Play more then ost, learn other factions, play AGAINST ost and you'll suddenly find out that the grass is not greener on the other side and you don't have it half as bad as you make it seem.

when was su76 ever overbuffed?

vCoH2 closed beta.

wooof, play with it, compare its AI to Tiger.
This is the situation where stats alone don't tell whole story.

Just, use IS-2 and see how it fares. I had multiple instances where I could just stand in front of it with shrek volks and unload until I had to retreat because of DSHK.

And I'm not talking about one shot squad kills, I'm talking about the main gun being simply ineffective against infantry with majority of its shots missing, some missing so hilariously that they hit next sector.

Why would you play USF above 1v1? Why would you play double USF in 2v2? Thats like playing with right hand tied behind your back.
Its a worthless late game faction if you don't use Infantry company 100% of the time and spam priests and LMG blobs.