Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?12 Apr 2015, 18:00 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 17:56 PMAlexzandvar I want to see Brits have 4 man squads, but have lots and lots of blob counters. As long as ost sniper exist and axis weapons are balanced to fight 5-6 men squads, you won't see that. Unless you want to see 4 men with 2 armor squads as base infantry and extremely strong sniper counter. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: is2 and tiger ace12 Apr 2015, 17:54 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 17:24 PMgokkel Why do you imply things when you have no clue? No, I don't only consider the direct engagement. "you" in my post was more like general player, not "you" specifically even though the post might have indicated so. Too many people compare them on 1v1 against each other basis and judge the balance on that, which is plain wrong approach. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: is2 and tiger ace12 Apr 2015, 15:29 PM Actually, relic had planned soviet doctirne with T34/85 aces and there is also elite armor doctrine with vetted P4s, lets put aside how useful the doctrine is, it provide P4 aces In: COH2 Balance
Thread: is2 and tiger ace12 Apr 2015, 13:26 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 13:11 PMgokkel From my experience the Tiger is not on par with the IS-2 right now. The advantages don't seem to outweigh the disadvantages, especially now after the Blitzkrieg nerf. And you only consider advantages and disadvantages only when Tiger is put against IS-2 and nothing else, right? Well surprise: Tiger isn't there to fight IS-2 exclusively, so stop making comparisons like that. USF sherman also looses to P4, I suppose we should buff USF sherman even thou its much more powerful against infantry, but garden that, only sherman vs P4 matters and sherman looses that which is unacceptable, right? Same with SU-85 vs JP4, I suppose we should now keep adressing SU-85 buff. OR jackson vs JP4, JP4 wins that easily, Jackson needs buff. Silly argument? Why? Its being used constantly with tiger and IS-2. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PTRS now OP?12 Apr 2015, 13:25 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 13:11 PMDakkaIsMagic Katitof, I love how the enemy makes one mistake during the match and then somehow you're the bad guy/notpro. This forum sometimes... I'm not surprised really. So many players here on the balance forums play against AI which makes no mistakes giggles so they can be confused sometimes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PTRS now OP?12 Apr 2015, 12:02 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 11:53 AMAladdin NOTHING justifies driving ur heavy tank on ice, when enemy is around. (As for someone to be called skilled player). Unless your oppnent is trying to blow up your base trucks and unless you have teleport device, you won't reach him in time if you won't cross the river herp derp. Even Jesulin can't build a bridge and would need to go over ice on that one new 1v1 winter community map. Bystra Voda. So you can't really say that. Had I not attempted retreat, he'd wreck me up with his KT, I had my tank in ideal place and ideal time by accident. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer, the never ending struggle12 Apr 2015, 11:23 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 11:18 AMLemonJuice What is your definition of a "good" usf player? Top 500? Top 250? Or top 10? Also no where do I advocate being defensive for the whole game. people just have a pretty determined way they think the game is to be played and are too afraid to really try new strategies that can potentially be very effective. Adding to that, many players think all factions play the same. Many think if con spam works well, then volkspam or grenspam should be just as good or better, completely ignoring the tiering structure, unit availability, economy and so on and are greatly surprised and disappointed that army made to use combined arms does not so good when you spam one unit type over and over. Some are still stuck in march deployment patch and its unthinkable for them that grenspam into tigers is not the way to go at all times. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: PTRS now OP?12 Apr 2015, 09:38 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Apr 2015, 02:37 AMAladdin He was a SKILLED PLAYER, and he drove his KT on ice for ya?!! you may consider revising your standards of a skilled player. His blob was pushing me all the time and he kidna had to to def his base which I decided to raid to bait his KT off the map. I hit him on my retreat accidentally. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What about su-76?12 Apr 2015, 09:12 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2015, 00:44 AMStonethecrow01 I agree Su-76 is not able to be used as an impact unit like the T-70. With veterancy it has substantially more uses as the game goes on though. Veterancy 2 -25% Barrage Recharge +20 Damage +30% Accuracy Veterancy 3 +10 Range on Barrage -25% Reload +25% Rotation While its not a bad vet, its hardly a game changer. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lack of credible defensive option11 Apr 2015, 22:03 PM Defensive options are provided by sandbags, bunkers and weapon teams. We don't really need more of that. In: COH2 Gameplay