According to that the game is balanced in 1v1
Nah navigating websites isnt the issue understanding data is...
These are the top 200 players. Not all verses the top 200 players. Alot are vs worse players (201-5000 sorta bracket).
Its expected most of these games would be wins.
3v3 and 4v4 balance doesn't really apply, it cant.
It still makes the average for all of the top 200 payers.
Top 200 allies fight just as much lower ranks as top 200 axis.
This is why the W/L ratio is above 60% instead of being around 50%.
The sample shows top 200 ranks, but there is even less then 800 unique top 200 players as its often same person for 3-4 armies, which makes it even more likely for top 200 to fight lower level, regardless of the side they are on.
Lower level players always over exaggerate balance problems, this is why we have players with 12k rank complaining how overpowered conscripts of partisans are.
The game might be balanced for a 1v1 and somewhat 2v2 player, but is not for 3v3 and 4v4 and definitely not because of soviet T3.