Oh, but its okay for example that the centaur can easily kill jp4s and stug with a few bursts in their behind or straifht up wins vs p4 from behind? I mean, its AA/AI after all and shouldnt have AT capabilities, right?
Yes, its fine, because slower tanks aren't usually sitting on the rear of faster tanks, unless you have learned how to a-move while reversing.
And if you want to theorycraft, then here is some food for thought for you:
222 can kill ISU from behind, it can also kill IS-2 that doesn't have DSHK pintle upgraded by circling it.
I suppose its high time we finally nerfed that imba 222.
Relic, as with most new releases, just made just about everything roughly twice as strong as would be reasonable for brits (bofors, centaur, commandos, air supremacy, crocs, wasps, churchill definitely at least) and now they're playing whack-a-mole, nerfing the most OP unit every month (and most likely fucking up balance somewhere else in the process).
Doesn't make it right that brit players get "free" wins just for buying DLC for qbout 2-3 months.
No, it doesn't work that way.
No amount of testers will even provide accurate feedback that would prevent all and any imbalance, ESPECIALLY if relic does balance changes between the closure of alpha and release of the game.
You don't release a whole new army and expect it to be balanced right out of the bat, because its impossible.