I apologize for my inaccuracy and any inconvenience it may have caused. I understand I have a duty to be as accurate as possible, yet I failed in that, and can only ask for forgiveness for my failure.
So we can say... "Got damn it, someone get him outta here". |
Prioritize vehicle for infantry AT (except PTRS). Although after a year, the original prioritize vehicle on tanks and ATGs is bugged as hell. |
I'm around 1500 with Ost. I got matched with Hand versus Tume and Ram1. You tell me who's got it worse?
Funny thing is, the moment I click on search, the glorious matchmaking found a freakin' game, in peak hours. |
Focus on the positives, you are gonna get laid like crazy. College chicks, am I right?
Take care. |
I think it's a troll thread. But anyway, Churchill it self is fine, Croc is still an issue. |
+1 to devs.
+10 to nigo.
It's sounds cool, if they don't sell if for $1 million. |
It's a Feature |
For starters, a faction with zero indirect fire units is bad design (USF and OKW say hi). Brits don't even have medium indirect fire, so you have to rely on Mortars at least.
But the current state of Brace is BS. They should use Target Tables for emplacements. The problem is not only ISG spam.
These are my humble opinions on how to tweak Emplacements(Keep in mind that I don't have Brits):
-Huge HP pool
-Greatly reduce received damage from light artillery (mortars) even without BRACE.
-Slightly reduce received damage from medium artillery (ISG) without BRACE, and greatly reduce it when BRACED
-Heavy artillery (LeFH) pieces should do "decent" amount of damage, when BRACED. Heavy arty should hard counter a defensive position (90% reduction for heavy arty is ridiculous)
-Infantry held anti garrison weapons (Flamers and nades) should do decent damage when BRACED.
-Non-High Explosive ballistic weapons (Panther, JagdPz) should not counter BRACED structures.
With these changes, they can make brace a toggle ability with a small cooldown (10-15)
Just my 2 cents.
|
not when u have to switch between AP and HE shells for the 75mm sherman its kinda of an inconvenience if u ask me
Which is a blessing of course. I would add HE/AT swap for almost every tank in this game (expect a a couple like Panther which should remain AT only). But swapping rounds is a cool feature which is helpful. |
It's a long story, which is probably boring, so briefly, up until about 1871, British officers tended to buy their commissions. This meant they had to have money and came from the wealthier sector of society. In turn, that sector tended to privately educate their children who were taught to speak "the Kings English/Queens English" which might be described as an affected drawl. If you spoke "properly", it differentiated you from the masses.
So translated into the military life, everything has to be unrushed and unhurried, organised and smart, because gentlemen (sic) don't rush about and must not panic in front of the men.
The Cardwell Reforms
The military also tend to use different terminology.
"Squiffy" means slightly drunk/disordered. It goes back to the 19th century in origin, apparently.
The quickest approximation is set out in the right hand table in the Wiki link below.
U and non-U
"U and non-U English usage, with "U" standing for "upper class", and "non-U" representing the aspiring middle classes, was part of the terminology of popular discourse of social dialects (sociolects) in Britain in the 1950s" - but it had started before that. WWII brought a strange amalgamation of affected U terminology and military slang
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U_and_non-U_English
Keep a stiff upper lip!
That was very interesting Major. I've always adored British accent (never had any luck learning it, specially London accent. RP is easier) and it was good to know that they actually spoke like this, they were supposed to be Smart asses! I'm reading the links you've provided right now. Thanks. |