Profile of CookiezNcreem

So now ur agreeing to basically all i said one by one...suddenly so many ost units need buff.I'm so glad we could agree on something finally.
Now answer ur statement..what does ost have best of?Ur statement .

Ostheer has the best T1 in the game.

Pios are good,second only to sturms.
Grens are good and scale well,plenty of utility.
MG42 is good,and will be awesome once again once blobs are nerfed
Mortar is best mortar in the game,put two of them together and they're every bit as good as a 120mm except range.
Sniper is questionable,I agree with you

PROBLEM THOUGH,is if you play too heavy Tier 1 then you're raped by AA HT or well played M20. so fix tech costs. dont buff anything here or you make ostheer OP. you see?

Pak is best AT gun in the game
Halftrack is early arriving and good against USF light vehicle play becasue it allows you to continue fighting and consolidate your forces instead of retreating and giving up map. If he goes LT he cant destroy a supported HT without suiciding his M20,which is a huge blow and a free zooka for you. a well played halftrack will ultimately win the game because the USF player cant force you off.


Pgrens have the best infantry AT alpha strike in the game,240 damage is almost half the health of a sherman.,and to compensate they are weak and will explode in one hit alot. Balanced. Or we have the old Pgren blob days that you conviently forget.

Pgrens are good against conscripts and unupgraded rifles.

221/222 I agreed is awful in comparison to m20 and M3.

T3 as a whole is full of very decent units overshadowed by call in meta and Jackson is a bit over the top WHICH I HAVE SAID,NEEDS less damage but more pen. I agree with you on this

T4 Is good if you can get there, but why do that when you have a tiger for way cheaper. Call in meta. Game Mechanic issue.

Otherwise,again,ostheer is solid...you cant debate that. Seriously just get a grip and work through it till the patch comes.


***I gave you your answer personally,and of course other people beat me to it multiple times because you're horribly wrong about ostheer.

Theyre in a good spot minus tech costs(including soviet call in spam) and blobbers. I dont know what else to tell you.

You just listed ostheers disadvantages, not balance issues

The 251 is amazing for keeping forward presence and Is the earliest combat reinforcement available.

They have the best early game combined arms options of anyone, that's why they have to build a building unlike anyone else

I already said the tech costs would be fixed. Clear your eyes of tears and you'll notice I said that.

Odtheer has elite infantry in storm troopers and vetted pgrens. They can't have the best everything.. Elite inf isn't Wehrmacht strength. its combined arms.

Tiger pak wall supported by grenadiers and tellers is a good late game.

And I didn't judge you from just your profile. I judged you from your posts, which are irritatingly biased. And the fact that you won't prove you aren't COMPLETELY biased by showing your player card either.

You didn't discuss anything, you just said "Well I find it to be just fine" and went from there. Not to mention the fact he has been bitching about the MG42 under preforming not Allies over preforming.

Even if he is "biased" your still supposed to take the high road and continue to argue in good faith, not immediately debase yourself to his level and start shit posting. The best way to build a coherent argument for something is always:

-Good grammar and spelling
-Objective evidence with personal commentary
-Keeping yourself above your opponent, avoid sounding angry
-Consistency in your narrative.

"No one does unsupported mg42,if it was as cool as u say after one game ost wouldn't be such shit.Its helpless vs both conscript orrah and smoke.And also suppressed squads wipe it for fun with nade.I'm sick of allied fanboys trying desperately and using every excuse in the book to keep ostheer dead.I'm tired of american infantry pushing grens for fun,then light vehicle reign of terror,followed by unkillable para blob and p-47 skillplane,jackson 3 shotting armoor,squads getting one shotted and what not.Its disgusting.Just disgusting..and even more disgusting watching these shameless usf fanboys defending their autowins.American riflemen in current state vs grenadiers is cheat unit."

I played the game.and Posted my findings. That was his BIASED assault post towards me.and you tell me to take the high road and not call him biased?

You really do not want to go down this route.

If anyone doesn't want to go down that route its you, axis team game at hero.

@austerlitz Im not even gonna argue with you because you damn near break into tears every time someone talks about ostheer.
@butcher well that's two good players with conflicting opinions.

@charlie yes attack my player card without showing yours. I regularly play against players with 1k+ hours while playing ost. Not OMGPOP and jesulin, but still players that know how to play. Also understand there is a tonof sov/ost players on the leaderboard after two years, and that rank 4k vanilla is more like rank 1-2k on a WFA faction. I haven't played many top 500s while plYing ost since I found CELO last year,but I did say that I played against good ost p
layers(top 200 every time)) as USF hat knew how to play and use mg42. The MG42 makes it harder for me to just roll the early game. When there's no MG42(gren spam) I love it. with an mg42 supporting my movements are slowed and i can't just waltz in with a blob and stomp your grenadiers because a MG IS THERE.


@johnnyb mg42 won't stop blobs, NO MG stops blobs. Therefore it isn't s problem with the MG42, its a problem with the game as a whole. It personally effects wehr a little more because they need it against a blobber as a defensive faction, Since grenadiers suck without MG support. So we implement one of the many anti blob ideas(that benefit everyone not just ostheer) that don't include over buffing the hell out of ost.