Profile of The amazing Chandler

Marcus +100

Z3r07 +100

Come on.. you can't be that naive.

The reason why lobby games are the pits is because it gives the hosting players the ability to choose their opponents, and they're looking for easy pickings. So really you're either looking to swindle some noobs to join a game so you can troll them or you're naive and you're setting yourself up for a big disappointment.

Once in a while you might get lucky and find a game where you get to build your pretty arty and watch the fireworks but you'll still have to swim through shit 90% of the time.

I feel sorry for this people, really. That's low. I would not to play with this players even in auto-match.
But you know, there are other people who will not be doing this because they want the exact opposite. To find a same skilled player and play a game and be able to choose the settings.

Look, i am not taking sides. I believe that everybody should get what he wants if its possible (and it is possible). At the moment only one side gets what they want!!!

I would say that the russin Halftrack should be in T2 like the German.
It is a infantry reinforce Unit, isn't it???
Why can the Germans have it in T2?
I know, not everything should be the same for the Factions but i think this should!!!

My argument is this:
The germans can choose (after T2) T3 or T4 and they still have the reinforcment-option.
The russions dont. The have to choose also between T3 and T4 but if they want T4 and the reinforcment-option they have to build T3 also.
Am i right? :-)

Now i get too (why everybody is bitching about the TA, and they are right).
I played yesterday a game (not playing so much online, about 30 games 1v1),
after 30 minutes of hard battle i had about 70% of the map and i had more units from my opponent. I was going to win but suprise,suprise, the TA came out and i lost. I could play better after the TA came out but beyond that, it is (you can say what ever you want german fanboys) a "out of jail card". Even my opponent admited that.
So sto whinning that it gets nerfed. Its suppose to because it is rediculously Stong.

"Inverse" wrote:

I've played Company of Heroes for over 5 years, I participated in the CoH2 alpha, beta, and two playtests at Relic's offices. I've talked to developers, engaged in discussions with other top players. I've put a hell of a lot of time into CoH and CoH2 because I want the game to be amazing

+1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Stoffa" wrote:

I love both of them (vCOH and COH2) in their own way. I do feel, however, that CoH2 deserves to be cut some slack since it's hardly the steaming pile of shit people make it out to be.

+1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Basilone" wrote:

7) Possibly the worst optimized game ever. Mid range cards have very inconsistent frame rates even on lowish settings. Even high end cards can barely manage to max the game out. No sli or crossfire support either, its like the gfx programmer is some intern working his way through gaming school.

+100
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Inverse" wrote:

Paid DLC is necessary. Paid DLC that affects gameplay is not. The game has no hope of being popular competitively if all commanders aren't available to everyone eventually.

+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This is from me:

I understand everyone who is upset with COH2 because, let us be honest, everybody expected more (i am not going in to details) but i also agree with the ones who like the game. The truth is in between IMO.

And one last thing (its a little bit of Topic i think).
What is that big difference about the cover-system (green,yellow,red cover) between the 2 games? I read it so many times and i googled it but i cant find a clear answer.
Please let me know...

Thanks!