Profile of Aerohank

Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2015, 12:47 PMArray

This is logical but you can see the amount of games played as axis / allies by top 200 players in the charts and whilst less its about 6000 axis compared to 4500 allies so the imbalance isn't that great. I'm not smart enough to crunch the numbers but a 25% difference in games played probably cannot fully account for the difference in win rate. Also consider another chart (I cant recall where it was) showing the win-rate curve across the entire playerbase which showed a steady but shallow rise until the top 50 where it rose exponentially - the allied teams being played by top 200 will have a broader range of skill than axis opponents but not necessarily by that much. I don't agree with the OP suggestions - but I do think as games get bigger axis gain a large advantage. I think to pull big games back towards a balanced center line needs a different approach - looking at resources and synergy between OH and OKW

Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2015, 12:14 PMaaa

I want my IS-2 and couple of ATG ready by the time P4 arrives.

Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2015, 05:33 AMCabreza

The last time a HT upgrade was gated behind teching the Wher Flame HT went from meta to never being seen again. The M5 quad needs to come earlier than T4 for it to be a viable choice. Right now it is just doing way too much damage for it's arrival time, particularly against light vehicles. Fix that and the quad will be in a much better place.