Profile of Affe

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 578

General Information


Thread: So, I want to watch 'Fury......'15 Nov 2014, 15:54 PM I have finally saw fury in the Cinema. I disliked this movie. Mainly because of many battle Scenes showed the german soldiers as a bunch of idiotic ork Hordes. The last battle Scene in the movie was the worst.After i saw that final engegemant i had the fealing that fury wanted to tell the Story how a single sherman tank had ventilated the whole german army completely alone. Extremely unrealistic rambo Scene. The portrayal of the german soldiers in "Fury": In most of the battle Scenes the Germans open fire on the americans but they seem to miss every single shot while the americans always hit. In the last battle Scene you can see how the Germans using there famous "Suicide-horde" tactics. Germans running around like headless chickens waiting to get mowed down by the US mgs in the hundreds.........many People laughed about how unrealistic the last battle was in the Cinema. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Soviet Commander idea 15 Nov 2014, 15:24 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Nov 2014, 15:09 PMdasheepeh More call ins, more call in meta, more FUN! I am not the one who invented this fail design of a gameplay where all Units are locked in 100000 commanders. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet Commander idea 15 Nov 2014, 15:00 PM Boring. I want so see new tanks like SU-100 or KV-85. "anti-tank gun ambush tactics" , "conscript assualt package upgrade" old shit i already know. I want to see some new stuff not the same shit over and over again. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Switzerland - The new axis faction15 Nov 2014, 11:18 AM I have watched the ardennes assault Trailer with great interest. Specially the map that relic Shows us. It clearly Shows us that switzerland and Germany didnt had any border in 1944 which means that switzerland must have fully joined and become a part of Germany in 1944. On the other Hand it seems that Austria(which was connected with Germany since 1938) has seperated from Germany in 1944 because the map Shows a border between These 2. The austrians must have lost interest in the war in 1944 and quit Germany and so switzerland must have taken there place. Since the ardennes assault map clearly Shows us switzerland as a new axis faction what do you expect from the swiss army? I hope to see the swiss army knife and chocolate cannons from them. Also as a Special ability switzerland could attack USA and soviets with financial santions with there massive bank System. Cant wait to hear the funny swiss accents. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Forget the pershing, Jumbo 76 is where it's at29 Oct 2014, 17:26 PM People talking so much bullsheet here its unbelievable. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Forget the pershing, Jumbo 76 is where it's at29 Oct 2014, 17:22 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Oct 2014, 16:05 PMferwiner It was quite similar despite the fact that it had 108mm of sloped frontal armour (for example tiger had 100mm, jumbo and pershing 102mm, and m10 57mm) OMG. M36 frontal armor was 60mm. 108mm(or 114) was the LOWER hull armor. These didnt Play any role because tanks can only shoot at the UPPER part of other tanks.Tanks from ww2 can not lower there gun enough to hit the lower hull. lower hull is the level where the tracks are tanks dont aim at this low Level they aim the upper part or the turret. http://i.imgur.com/CkADS2B.png In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Forget the pershing, Jumbo 76 is where it's at23 Oct 2014, 16:54 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 16:50 PMtheblitz6794 Affe, the Pershing would be a lot more expensive than the Jumbo since it can outfight anything except a KT/JT. I'd rather have a Jumbo 76 that can do its job well enough and come in at a reasonable time than bank for a super late game M26 Ok is see USA is not allowed to have a late game. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Forget the pershing, Jumbo 76 is where it's at23 Oct 2014, 16:49 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 16:40 PMtheblitz6794 In my opinion, which is obvious if you had actually read my post, the Jumbo is neither worse nor better than the Pershing, just different. If I am incorrect, post some specs to show me I'm wrong. Til then, have fun with the strawman argument Perhing has a much better main gun, he is faster he has the same front armor and better side and rear armor than Jumbo. Jumbo has only disadvantages. Jumbo is weaker at everything. Its a downgrade compared to the much better and modern Pershing. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Forget the pershing, Jumbo 76 is where it's at23 Oct 2014, 16:36 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 16:34 PMtheblitz6794 Uh, where did I say USA are not allowed to have 1 good tank? Edit: nvm I should be ignoring him. He's making an emotional argument Here: Forget the pershing, Jumbo 76 is where it's at USA Need to have the weaker one because the faction is designed to have shitty tanks. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Forget the pershing, Jumbo 76 is where it's at23 Oct 2014, 16:30 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 16:28 PMtheblitz6794 Me: "Thought out post that includes a comparison of the Tiger and Panther to the Pershing and includes a reason on why the Jumbo is a better fit because its a Sherman" You: "Durr Pershing like this Jumbo boring becuz Sherman" Way to contribute absolutely nothing good sir! You : "Oh dont add Pershing better add the much more boring and weaker Jumbo". USA ARE NOT ALLWOED TO HAVE AT LEAST 1 GOOD TANK". Jumbo is shit compared to the Pershing. Pershing is better at everything. In: COH2 Gameplay