Profile of elchino7

While i have been in favour of an overhauling on what benefits gives veterancy, specially vcoh2 vet1 abilities, what does coh2.org think about the 25% extra range?
The only useful thing for this is to be able to nade an MG while being supressed or when stacking bulletins and nading from extreme ranges against unsuspected opponents.

Anyways, does this improves gameplay? Would this improve anything at all MG performance in this specific scenario?
What about a cooldown reduction instead ?

i'm kind of confused by the vet of OKW. OKW is supposed to be the veteran faction but they get more vet levels than everyone else, which kind of implies that they're not very veteran and so have more to learn (or that they're super people). they could have given them 2 vet levels and had them start at the equivalent of vet 1. would have solved a lot of problems with creep

And what's the point of vet then ? Just give the buff and done.

then they have issues period and if i look on the stats correctly the soviets are also dominating the ost. surprising since cheesy tacts like sniper spam, maxim spam and the power of the early game m3 causes this. issues that the okw doesnt suffer.

Doesn't the fact that one faction can counterplay another faction kind of prove there's a major balance problem between them?

-Obviously this only talking about 1v1 and not even 2v2 and up.-

My comment was more explaining WHY OH was underrepresented on the tournament. I didn't draw conclusion or denied anything on that comment.

OST vs SU is fine. "Fine" if we consider that it's either a Call in vs Call in match up or stock vs stock units. Thing is, OH doesn't bring anything up to the table and OKW can do "everything" better without struggling against USF on most maps.

OST vs USF. Thing is that most of the time you won't catch up fast enough in time or even survive during the early/mid game to make any kind of profit from it's mid-late game.


I'm an advocate of adjusting mostly the OH teching, not so much unit performance.

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

221 is as expensive as an M3 (20mp difference same fuel cost). Performance is fine, again timing and teching are the only issues.

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

Riflemen vs Gren:
So mostly every engagement goes around a 2v2 model fight on which at the end of the day it's decided on RNG. Obviously a "crit" early on it's what decides mostly the result of the matchup.

Gren will beat MP wise a Riflemen at long range. Basically, when played defensively and using cover. Thing is you won't capitalize this early on due to teching dispartiy between factions.

And here we go again.
People don't want the game fixed/improved cause they are afraid on which order it's gonna be done. And knowing Relic's times, i can understand it.

Ex: let's not fix call in meta, because we can't expect a better performance/timing etc of stock tanks.


Anyways: "Everything changed when the nation of WFA attacked"

I don't like that idea. If you pulled all 3 trucks, you did the tech and you should be able to pull out units out of those trucks.

Losing a truck or two is not a nothing for OKW. It's a huge setback because you lost retreat point and healing station probably.

OKW is designed to work that way.

If you destroyed a forward truck or two, you should be able to close the game, VI B or not.

If you took huge loses in doing so, and left opponent with enough infantry to turn the game around than you didn't really did that good to deserve victory, did you?

Should I win if I send all my units to Soviet base and destroy barracks losing most my units in process and then complain about IS2 turning the game around even tho I punished him with destroyed barracks?
I don't think so....

If the meta wasn't ruled by callins, imagine being 120fuel behind withouat access to T3/T4. At least OH buildings is cheaper due to expensive tech.

AND USF has a big annoying base.