Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: 6pounder(57mm) = 75mmPak ?10 Sep 2015, 16:17 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 08:41 AMCptEend Perhaps, but you can't simply nerf the 6 pounder if Brits don't get other reliable AT options, such as better PIATs. Or if you're gonna make it more expensive, something should be done about British MP problems. Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 08:45 AMKoufromMizuchi Not just one should be looked at. Brit can have better PIAT and less mp problem through patches. And this one should perform that worth its mp cost, not more. Thing is, it's probably that it get fix one at a time, rather than in a whole context. So while a balancing is needed, i don't think this is priority at the moment. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brit units and abilities10 Sep 2015, 04:12 AM Don't leave your home without Spearhead doctrine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pacific Front10 Sep 2015, 04:01 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 02:57 AMBasilone would like a Japan vs US but in a CoH3 rather than a expansion. For Japs to work right and be somewhat authentic there would need to be maps designed specifically for them like in Rising Storm. In: Lobby
Thread: Should the USF AT gun recieve a buff?9 Sep 2015, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 12:56 PMThoseDeafMutes Wait what when did this change? You are confused by M10/M36 AP rounds which are unlocked with vet. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20159 Sep 2015, 06:47 AM This Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 18:25 PMCookiezNcreem Why do you guys insist on turning heavies into these counter-all vehicles all the sudden. Weren't we working away from a heavy tank meta.. There is no reason give heavy tanks longer ranges to deal with tank destroyers. Tank destroyers are supposed to kite heavy tanks. Is that not obvious? To deal with this,you support your heavy tank with 50-60 range units... The KT literally does not need this. Just park a Jp4(which flat out beats SU85s and jacksons) right next to it.. Same with tiger,even though its harder since they lack a 60 range TD(SO BUFF THE STUG TO BE INLINE WITH OTHER FACTIONS 60 RANGE TD's,NOT THE TIGER. #JustRelicBalancing),park double paks,or a couple stugs with a halftrack to reinforce paks that were hit by artillery. I dont understand. Please dont put this in live. And if youre planning on giving a pershing(when its added) 45-50 range,please reconsider. Its only moving towards taking away from late game combined arms. The other changes are +1 btw,but why go 4-5 steps forward and 1 step back. And i gonna rescue this post. Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 19:18 PMCorp.Shephard Are some of the British Artillery abilities being looked into? There are some late game British artillery abilities that are simply too powerful/offer no counter-play options. One that has really bothered me is the Tactical Support Regiment's Artillery Cover ability. The ability drops in with no smoke and appears to start the bombardment very quickly after being "placed" on the map. I don't have a huge issue with the way this ability works on infantry. I think it fires on units when there's no vision (which I don't like the idea of) but regardless it has a clear counterplay: just leave the area. For countering vehicles and tanks though the ability is simply bonkers. The shells that the artillery drops: Stun/damage engine regardless of armor level. Even the highest armor unit, a Jagdtiger, was getting stunned/engine damaged with every shell. This is not just the JT (which is vulnerable to stun). Other tanks like Jagdpanzers and Panzer 4s have been stunned reliably as well. Never seem to miss or scatter. Always penetrate and do some damage. Don't appear to require line of sight on the tank? Your tanks in the area of effect are chain stunned by these shells. When they aren't stunned their engines are always damaged by the first couple of shells and have limited/no mobility. What is the counter play for this? I can't "hide" from the enemies in the fog of war as the bombardment seems to hit me anyways. I can't "run" my tanks away as the engine damage/stun makes my tanks almost impossible to control. I can't fight my way out because I am being stunned constantly. I can't even protect my tanks with my infantry as they are getting hit by cloud-burst shells that are very lethal and have to retreat. Abilities like this need to have their power checked and I hope it's being looked into. In the very least they need a clear "counter-play" option. Regardless of my problems... I really like the changes that have been presented in the balance-mod! The flamethrower changes and many others look spot on. Please keep up the good work! Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 19:40 PMFiresparks it's 6.4-6.1 second reload with a 1 second wind down added on top, meaning it's 7.25 second reload on average. 7.375 second if you include the fire aim time. And the ready aim time makes it 7.5 Both OKW and OH reload at the same time as it seems both have wind time. In: Lobby
Thread: Brit-like redesign for outdated commanders9 Sep 2015, 06:25 AM +1 Too late here, i'll add ideas later on. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors needs a nerf against infantry9 Sep 2015, 06:19 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 06:11 AMJohnnyB ...And how many people noticed that....? I bet not to manny .... Adapt or perish. MHT every game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should the USF AT gun recieve a buff?9 Sep 2015, 06:16 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 20:45 PMRollo Increase the AP rounds pen. Otherwise decrease the arc and make the stock pen higher. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Are the Brits actually OP?9 Sep 2015, 06:14 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 00:58 AMJadame! Up without other allied factions support, op with it. Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 01:05 AMThoseDeafMutes They are OP and UP in different ways. + Croc too good in current live version + Bren WASP has too much range/damage in live version + Commandos too powerful overall + Some abilities too good + Bofors nuking things in buildings instantly is obviously dumb and their vs inf accuracy too good in live version - Sniper openings absolutely wreck Brits who have no meaningful counters until its far too late. - British early game is weak, especially vs OH. - British are garbage in 1v1s in general, especially vs OH - British have a variety of garbage units to complement the OP ones. - British lack good artillery. Mortar pit is solid, Base 25 pnders are abysmal and Sexton is terrible. +1 Exactly. I'll add some things. + Commander abilities are really good in general. For example: TIL Artillery cover can really wreck you. I would love the IL2 been as good as the Typhoons. The global presence with offmaps can get really annoying on the higher modes. - 222 can wreck you till you get a AEC but a faust and 2-3 222s can own you really badly. Get some mines. + Barrage with bofor is also good - Fire wrecks you. MHT all day. +/- IS scales really well but unless you get some bs wipes and mp damage, you are gonna suffer from the effect "i've too few units in comparison to my opponent". + GL winning against brits if they ever survive well into the lategame. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: does the Penal satchel no longer ohk building?8 Sep 2015, 19:46 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Sep 2015, 11:50 AMTrubbbel I read the dps Conscript far ex reload: 0.771 Conscript far inc reload: 0.734 Penal far ex reload: 0.738 Penal far inc reload: 0.676 So, ok sure, but it's really about the same I would say. No way to tell if the figures are still valid though https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IX68mtMEFLUVZCJpdgLxtm9cLajZATNRwISihru8rZM/edit#gid=0 That's outdated. Use coh2stats for a more updated one. In: COH2 Balance