Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: The future of COH2 post April / May patch25 Apr 2016, 20:58 PM Exterminatus has been declared on page 3. Remain on topic and try to have a civilized discussion. In: Lobby
Thread: Give Rakken a 'dig in' ability.25 Apr 2016, 20:22 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2016, 11:29 AMMoerserKarL My Suggestion is, just decrease the vet requirements slighty [faster vet/ more XP] Never seen a vet3+ püppchen It's been a while since i played 1v1, but i do frequently get vet3+ Rak on the higher modes (2v2+), specially after they hit vet1 as they are easier to micro (cloaked all the time). Prioritize vehicles while in garrison would be good as a starter. On the current patch i do think they are fine, but with the new mod, i think some tweaks might need to be done if PS are removed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Updates on BALANCE PREVIEW MOD 25 Apr 2016, 20:00 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2016, 15:48 PMAerohank 222, flamer halftracks, AA halftracks, Panzer 2, 250 halftracks (rare). All of these are countered by the T70, and the T70 is also extremely lethal against infantry and is part of the natural tech progression for Soviets. Doesn't the 222 and the P2 fair well against the T70? And while we don't see AA HT cause of it's ease of use, doesn't a defensive AA HT deal a considerable amount of damage on approach? In: Lobby
Thread: These OKW HQ nerfs are over the top24 Apr 2016, 22:01 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Apr 2016, 02:48 AMImagelessbean I don' t think messing with things too much is my preferred method. I like the idea of a simple upgrade. Maybe 15 fuel is too high, but it is close to the cost for all other factions. For comparison, 250 MP buys static healing at a Soviet base. I suspect the price will change slightly but not much. It's not a matter of cost, rather than timing. Healing gets push a bit too back, specially if you go mechanized. That's why i'm saying that it could be better to push back others thing or increase cost of other tech instead. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: These OKW HQ nerfs are over the top24 Apr 2016, 02:38 AM Tournament/Custom games > Ladder Playing more games won't give you necessarily more knowledge on interactions or game mechanics. I think this preview patch is more about gathering information by spreading out "Mirage's mod" in order to get further playtests than a simple preview of what's coming up. There are good, bad and questionable changes but i think there's little point on discussing about the players on the balance group in comparison to the changes themselves. Regarding the changes, i think it's a good idea to give side tech upgrades to OKW, but i do think healing should be more accessible. I'll rather put other things behind as upgrades (MG, flame nades, shreck/Panzerbuche) as leave the current status for the medics. What could also work, is making SP vet1 medkits be AoE consumables while also putting them at vet0. PD: what about bringing back resource conversion? Maybe as an upgrade? Maybe mp drain instead of muni/fuel drain? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Doctrine Arty/strikes22 Apr 2016, 21:27 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2016, 15:41 PMpugzii Yeah man let me drop zeroing arty in the base sounds balanced. Nah Air supremacy or GTFO. Although artillery cover sounds nice. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Off-Maps in HQ Sectors Poll22 Apr 2016, 19:21 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2016, 03:49 AMPercieis I know the OKW bunkers are more powerful, on account of them being able to damage light vehicles and shoot down planes rarely, but, other than the extra 2 on the base circle itself, what makes USF bunkers more powerful than Ost, Sov, or Brit bunkers? The extra MGs on the circular base are unnecessary IMO. We have problems on certains maps that MG bunker cover part or completely strategic points outside base, sometimes this extra bunkers make it worst (example Crossing in the Woods). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Off-Maps in HQ Sectors Poll22 Apr 2016, 03:28 AM Since WFA and UKF brought powercreep to offmaps thus they decide to disable some of them, my answer is yes so as to bring consistency overall. On the other hand, i'll say we need less powerful bunkers inside base (OKW/USF) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: April 27th Balance Preview Mod Release Notes21 Apr 2016, 22:36 PM -Mines If the model that triggers the mine dies, the rest of the changes are golden. -Core Infantry/Small Team Weapon Spawn Points All Core Infantry Squads and Core Small Weapon Teams now spawn from its corresponding building rather than from Off-Map. Not sure about this one. If it's really needed at all. Snipers • Target size from 1 to 1.15. Will this affect SU snipers? Can we finally give them same cloaking capabilities as other snipers, make the spotter not be able to shoot, increase hp of sniper model (but reduce sight range and leave it to the spotter). Trip-Wire Flare Mine Can we make all type of flares reveal cloaked units ? Volksgrenadier • Panzershrek Package removed. • Added StG 44 Package. Grants the squad two StG 44s that improve short-mid range combat for 60 munitions. • Panzerfaust ability added which is unlocked after a truck is built. There's no pretty nor easy way to fix this. ATM i prefer the current situation but i'm open to ideas. I'll rather have a slightly worst Volk Shreck and improving the other Elite squads from OKW. Adjust Obers, and fix spacing from Falls. I'll like having the option to call them from base for their "real cost". PD: while the changes are huge, there are still a lot of things that have been forgotten. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is the pace of innovation slowing? 20 Apr 2016, 22:25 PM Idea was fine, implementation was bad. In: COH2 Gameplay