Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Hetzer coming? Ambush Assault Doctrine19 May 2016, 18:01 PM Minions, servants, soldiers of the cold dark, obey my call and let this thread rest. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [OKW] Possible alternatives for the MG42 call in19 May 2016, 17:52 PM Jump back to quoted post19 May 2016, 13:41 PMmycalliope first replace that airborne assault ability Improve/fix it. If the planes were slightly better (tracking/damage) the ability would be really fine. Fortifications: *-OKW related-* -For the Fatherland -Forward receivers -Early warning -Goliath *-OH-* -Hulldown -Riegel -LeFH Luftwaffe: *-OKW related-* -Flakpanzer -Sectour assault *-OH-* -Recon plane/pass -Smoke bombs -Strafin run/pass -CAS In: Lobby
Thread: Week 3 Update to the Balance Mod19 May 2016, 17:40 PM -Rollback medium crush change. If the problem is M10/Cromwell, just reduce slightly rotation rate. As a last choice, remove it from the M10. -I know this is a preview patch, but what's the point of doing triple buffs? Wouldn't either damage or better AOE profile on nade work instead of both? -Compare KV1 with Churchill -Cromwell size was a long overdue. Wouldn't it be better to put it at 22 with the rest of the mediums bar M4s? (I find it funny calling it a "slightly" increase of size although ) -USF mortar shouldn't be an OH mortar In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Cheating in Company of Heroes 2 (news from Relic)18 May 2016, 19:19 PM Jump back to quoted post18 May 2016, 17:34 PMRedT3rror I wonder what makes you think so. If a game has multiplayer, there are hacks. It's as simple as that. That been said, you shouldn't get paranoic and think everyone cheats. You need to have plenty of knowledge regarding game mechanics before accusing/thinking that someone is cheating. Let's take BF, an FPS as an example. People tend to throw the word cheater/hacks way too easily, specially when they don't know what is possible/impossible to perform ingame. A valid point of discussion would be: does it change something to you, if you face a real good player or a hacking player that emulates what a real player does? (This means the cheater is not making nothing out of the extraordinary) Not so long ago, there was a huge case of botting on Hearthstone (trading card game by Blizzard). Does it change whether you face a human or an AI if both do the same actions and react on similar ways? Note: cheating/hacking/botting should be severely punished, what i'm trying to point out is that you should focus on what YOU can change, and not on your opponent. In: Lobby
Thread: A single change that could fix a lot of problems17 May 2016, 18:27 PM Jump back to quoted post17 May 2016, 18:22 PMMr.Smith Powercreep or bad memory In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Cheese start - Please help17 May 2016, 18:21 PM Moving to stage Office. In: Red Army Strategies
Thread: Non-meta doctrine fixes [UKF]17 May 2016, 18:14 PM Jump back to quoted post17 May 2016, 00:42 AMSuperhet Field Recovery Operation Air Resupply Operation Artillery Cover Forward Observation Post Both field recovery and Air resupply work in synergy. Also the engis come with sweeper straight from the bat and are a good platform to put them PIATS on. Munition for mp is always a good trade (in fact, this should mimic to USF doctrines with paradrop support weapons). Artillery cover remains as one of the best offmaps in the game and the sole reason you would choose this commander. Instead i think AC should be part of one of the Forward Observation Post abilities and this thing reworked. Proposal: cost of building, abilities and CP reduced. Possibility of using Forward assemblies as FOP. Swap artillery cover with strafing run. Jump back to quoted post17 May 2016, 00:42 AMSuperhet Commando Regiment Smoke Raid Operation Commando Glider Insertion See Mr.Smith/Svanh comments Jump back to quoted post17 May 2016, 00:42 AMSuperhet Royal Engineer Regiment Anti-Building Flame Mortar Support Demolition Specialist "AVRE" Flame barrage should also target neutral buildings as well. Avre is fine. AVRE/ST could be brought to same CP levels. Regarding Royal Artillery, since almost no one use it, i have almost none xp regarding how the changes needs to be implemented. In: Lobby
Thread: [May Patch] Remove the self spotting ability from the SU8517 May 2016, 18:06 PM Jump back to quoted post17 May 2016, 07:40 AMMyself Iirc "tracking" on vehicles did not reveal infantry in the mini map before that patch. The zis "tracking" would not reveal infantry either until you merged conscripts to the zis. Once you merged conscripts tracking would reveal infantry on the mini map. Since i don't have such a good memory, i won't be able to tell if it did or didn't work at that time. But the description of the ability hasn't change at it's been "detect infantry on minimap" since release. Jump back to quoted post17 May 2016, 07:40 AMMyself "Tracking" is about "ok" as an ability, the combo of "focused sight" and "tracking" is problematic on the SU-85, 105 sight range on a TD with range 60 is simply way too much. A TD should not become better than stock recon vehicles...(222 sight should also be capped). Problem is stacking effects. Focused sight on it's own is fine as you get a hefty drawback on mobility. Same with tracking which is something average on both the Su76 and Zis/45mm at gun in comparison to Twp like abilities. What is not fine, is the homogeneous of all EFA vet1 abilities. This is why all OH tanks/pak have either blitz or twp (heck even Brummbar had it prior to bunker busting) and all SU tank/pak have capture point/tracking. Remove tracking from vet1 and replace it with something else. On the past i've suggest a twist on the TWP and ambush camouflage ability. Conceal the tank, make it immobile and make the shot have either increased damage/some temporal crit. Jump back to quoted post16 May 2016, 22:40 PMGumboot Id rather see the InfraHT removed from the game more so then the SU85 self spot. I'll rather have they fix it, specially if OKW is gonna get reliable stock suppression. (This is real maphack). In: Lobby
Thread: Royal Engineers are op17 May 2016, 00:59 AM -I think i've reported several months ago the bug with the flamethrower. (Lazy to look for it atm) -Reinforcement cost reduction at vet3 IS OP. OP: while the subject is valid, next time try to raise the quality of the opening post. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Victory Points 17 May 2016, 00:43 AM Closing for duplicate. In: COH Central