Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: has anyone ever been banned from the game?15 Mar 2017, 18:46 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2017, 18:32 PMsiuking666 lol in many countries use of Swastikas and glorification of Hitler is not a crime or a valid reason to get banned I'm sure that somewhere on that long piece of text no one reads whenever they install Steam or CoH2 there's something which allows them to ban you for even less. It's not about been a crime or not, just don't be an asshole. In: Lobby
Thread: Instant garrisoning/ungarrisoning NEEDS to go.13 Mar 2017, 18:48 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2017, 13:04 PMMr.Smith Actually, that's an excellent middle-ground solution. My prime beef with garrisons doesn't have to do with nades/etc. It has to do with the fact that you can abuse garrisons, ESL-style, and hop your squad in-out. You have sturmpioneers creeping up on you from a single-window angle? Just hop in and out with your Tommies. Your Tommies can fire their single shot gun, hop out to reload, and hop back in. In between, Sturmpioneers have minimal to 0 opportunity to employ their DPS. This will make loading-unloading comparable to transport vehicles. You simply can't abuse this load-unload cheese on transports, even if the vehicle is bulletproof. That delay is the reason for this. More than doing damage, i think it's more about denying a building why not wanting to take damage while you wait for your others squads to arrive. This is pretty common on maps which have key important buildings (such as Ettelbruck or Lierneux). Doors and small amount of windows sides don't coincide so "hiding" and just hoping to get vision is pretty common. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Instant garrisoning/ungarrisoning NEEDS to go.13 Mar 2017, 12:33 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2017, 22:00 PMStorm Elite Grenades in particular are COMPLETELY useless against garrisoned squads, ESPECIALLY non-setup teams, which literally teleport instantly, at the speed of light, rendering grenades -- the primary anti-garrison ability in Relic's tactical RTS games -- useless. You have to learn to AIM those grenades and see where the models are at. It's not just "throwing a nade in the middle of the building". If you expect micro from your opponent, then you aim it at doors. The argument that grenades are not been effective against garrison are equal if it would be applied to cover. Units move in and out of it all the time. Grenades are not the PRIMARY ANTI GARRISON tool. That's flame based weapons and constant indirect fire, basically DoT (damage over time). Grenades are for punishing NON micro. But X faction doesn't have access to Y tools! That's a problem of the faction design and not the tools. That been said, I'M IN FAVOUR of adding delays to ENTERING but not EXITING garrisons. Why? Because there are too many ways you could exploit squads sitting around idle at doors (nades, infantry body blocking, wire, crushing, etc). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Changing the Lend-Lease commander11 Mar 2017, 17:10 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Mar 2017, 15:52 PMOsinyagov Hordes of cons/penals with zooks/bars and support of DShK and M4A2(76)? To much for the Motherland actually In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: My WWII veteran grandpa is dying.9 Mar 2017, 14:40 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Mar 2017, 11:36 AMWilliam Christensen Not many WW2 veterans are left and i'm afraid that 1 day, not many even know what WW2 even was. Very sad that it's already happened somewhere... Share his stories to those you know, let everyone remembers him.‎ Well, take a look at what happened with WWI. I think games, movies, series bring interest on the subject and if done correctly they help giving some kind of background and superficial knowledge about this events. My grandfather passed away 2 weeks ago at the age of 94. He was on the Pacific theatre (Japanese). Unfortunately i know too little about what he experienced cause he didn't like to talk about it, which is understandable. The few things i know are fragments of what he or my grandmother could mention about it. He survived a bombing run to the transport boats near Okinawa (500ish out of +3000 survived) and had to swim back into the island. For some time he was part of the Shinyo, basically Kamikaze boats and at the end of the war, he went to Hiroshima in order to clean the city. From my grandmothers words: "He dropped any religious belief after going to Hiroshima. There couldn't be any god as that place was hell in earth". In: Lobby
Thread: ISU 152, Jagd and Ferdinand. Why don't they share range.9 Mar 2017, 06:38 AM One week ago comment. Disclaimer: implement whenever we nerf party cover, crushwell and comets. JT: one of the reasons you want Artillery cover. This kinda of age of empires wonders are mostly never field on 1v1 but are commonly seen on 2v2+, specially depending the map. Plausible changes: not all, a combination or just a single one. -Remove engine upgrade. -Reduce range to 70 (same as Ele and ISU). Adjust cost. Give it a mode on which it further reduces speed/rotation to almost none but gains back 85 range. -Target tables. Super heavies are more vulnerable to howitzer like type of ONMAP artillery. Suxton, Anvil (?), Priest, LeFH, 152. We don't need call in late game wonders which win the game by sitting "iddle" at max range nuking things. Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2017, 22:29 PMDonnieChan i suggest grabbing a time machine and going back to late 2013 +1 Let's not go back into making every 2v2+ game into ISU vs Elephant/JT by making them have 85 range back. ISU role is not to be strong AT wise, but a pak/infantry unit deleter late game. The AT shell could be made to be less SAD whenever it BOUNCES (increase deflection damage to 33%) which would make it hit like a zook (80dmg) every +10s. I don't think that would make it OP since you don't want to use the ISU as an AT platform. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Blizzards8 Mar 2017, 20:34 PM Sigh NOPE In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer infantry scaling8 Mar 2017, 13:53 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2017, 07:38 AMullumulu but if u calc: a 5model volks squad cost 250MP = 50MP/ model a 6model penal squad cost 300MP = 50MP/model a 4model falls squad cost 440MO = 110MP/ model I'm not gonna analyse the performance of those squads, but mind you that this is not the correct way to look at their "reinforcement cost". General rule of thumb: -most units reinforce for 50% of the cost per model. -The cost of call in units doesn't correlate all the time to the actual VALUE of the unit. This applies to some tanks and mostly infiltration infantry. For ex: Falls cost 440MP to call in, but their value is 380mp. AND they reinforce for 40%, same thing happens to PG. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Complain about history as if were CoH26 Mar 2017, 14:01 PM Who had the "awesome" idea of putting Stalingrad on the map rotation? GGWPNORE as Axis. In: Lobby
Thread: Have Relic abandoned the game?5 Mar 2017, 18:16 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Mar 2017, 15:45 PM__deleted__ How you can call incendiary round a feature ? It´s the same as demo, wiping squad for 45 munny. Some units cannot do a shit about this, like mortars and AT guns. Are we talking about sniper incendiary round right? Not sure what is the bug you are talking about besides it having like 1000% accuracy so it won't miss on retreat. Same with aimed shot, it was designed to work like that. Do you really find it fine that unit/vehicle dies because it cannot move throught fucking gosted wire/tank trap ? Yes, cause the alternative is to make everything phase through. Call it a certain degree of micro, simil to blocking the path of retreating squads with a vehicle. I don't think it's GOOD but i consider it fine. If you do not consider mortar firing 2 rounds a bug, then what is pershing with his double shot yolo round killing his counters ? The effect of 2 mortar shots firing with a random scatter is less pronounced that the polarising effect of having two rounds of 160dmg from a medium heavy tank which can lead to killing a vehicle. That's what i'm trying to say. HMG firing arc is a visual bug ? lol. It is really annyoing when you do not know where exatly the hmg can fire, often changing good flank into deathtrap. Yep, simil with other UI problems the game has (ex: party cover). The 4 i put bolded are the ones which are really annoying/gamebreaking (tank phasing, MG wipes, weapon exploit and vehicles getting stuck). AGAIN, you have to differentiate BUGS from BALANCE and from DESIGN issues. Take for example the suppression mine issue: -IF the mine is not applying any amount of suppression then it's a BUG -IF the mine fails to suppress the squad due to AoE not been big enough to affect all models when squad formation is spread out, then it's a BALANCE concern. In: Lobby