Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: About Jacksons13 Mar 2018, 05:19 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2018, 04:08 AMFiresparks then it would just be turning the jackson into the Firefly. We are just digging a deeper grave for variety. this is why I suggested giving jackson better survivability by giving it smaller size, sight, smoke, and rotation, instead of buffing the HP. The thing is, i don't think there's gonna be time nor space to test another itineration of what the Jackson is supposed to look like. The Jackson currently is a FF, which is more or less what USF needs for the late game. For cheap, mobile AT, they already have the doctrinal M10. If USF had been thought to have some late game transition, it would probably would had upgrades for the Sherman, but that's has been settle down to be a commander slot. Right now you are juggling with having a proper TD which can tackle heavy armor vehicles, while not been 2 shotted by them (which was basically the reason Jackson went to 640HP instead of either 560HP/600HP). Maybe 600HP should be tested, since the heavy long range TD had been nerfed against mediums, but there's so much HP you can reduce if the tank is meant to cost 400mp 140f purely AT. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The age-old double soviet sniper conundrum12 Mar 2018, 18:46 PM This was the line of thought in my opinion: 1- Stealth was really cancerous when you knew how to properly exploit it aka engage from out of cover and quickly re enter to gain stealth. Combat will had no repercussion. Therefore this was fixed so you MUST shoot from cover to regain faster cammo. 2- 222 was bugged, both cost and MG. MG was not properly working since like release of the game. Therefore as a pre-emptive action, the performance was tone down. IMO probably to account for the reduction on survivability on snipers. What could be done: A) Set MG modifier against sniper to 1.0 or 1.25. Chasing sniper with 222 and not killing it is silly. B) Make the spotter mosin nagant rifle from the SOV sniper the weapon to be transferable. This makes counter sniping possible as you can't be sniped back while still keeping the soviet sniper squad alive. C) Make all soviet flares reveal stealth units (trip wire, mortar and sniper). For trying: either reduce sniper flare cost or make it not break stealth. Now you both OH/SU sniper been able to 1 shot each other through the use of their vet 1 ability. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About Jacksons12 Mar 2018, 18:27 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2018, 13:16 PMLeo251 Back to topic plz. IMO, M36 Jacksons get a double buff in the last patch: From one hand they get their HP boosted. But they also get the "indirect buff" of the Panther nerfs, and the Heavy Axis TD damage reduced (elephant and JT). Thats the reason why we now watch jacksons rounding around the map with almost any proper counter. OKW PV got nerfed overall (cheaper worst performance) and OH PV got buffed (buffed overall only nerf was popcap). New Jackson shoot as fast as new OH PV (0.1s difference). But they were never the answer to Jackson as high pen is irrelevant against them. OH PV has an equal stand against new Jackson. From 3 vs 4 shots to pen to kill each other to 4 vs 5 while they now have pretty equal RoF. Ele/JT are irrelevant for 1v1 but still useable on the same maps they have always seen use on 2v2+. Ele not so much as the 10 range difference with JT makes it less desirable. The biggest change was the dynamic with T3 vehicles. Any 2 tanks which were able to get into range of a Jackson, were able to kill them fast. If you knew there was a Jackson still, it was easier to just boom rush it frontally with either PIV or Stug, as you only needed 3 shots to kill it. Jacksons changes required? Start with taking away rotation, turret rotation, speed/acc. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Riflemen Sandbags11 Mar 2018, 01:47 AM Mod: not everyone here is a native english speaker as this is a forum which gathers people from all around the world. But all of us make the effort to make as understand as good as possible. Punctuation makes reading a post easier to do so. If you want others reading and understanding what your write, that's the least you can do. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mortars/Indirect have broken the game10 Mar 2018, 15:43 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Mar 2018, 08:38 AMVipper One could lower damage from auto to 70 and leave barrage to 80. Or one could lower HP to hmg and mortars to 60 with target size of 1 and lower damage to 64. Lowering HP means that other things are deadlier against them. Light vehicles and tanks chasing have a much easier time, while any grenades means basically a wipe on them (even behind heavy cover). Even more nuke nades. Not gonna mention offmaps. For early game, 60HP means it alters some match ups and recrewing weapons becomes much more appealing even if it has a higher reinforce cost. Not sure if you meant to reduce their HP to 64 or 60, but i guess at 64 it would remain the same against small arm fire. PD: i'm in favour for nerfing auto and buffing barrage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Range Rings for more Units10 Mar 2018, 15:25 PM For infantry it's useless. All infantry weapons have 35 range. This includes AT rocket weaponry. While HTD is active, guards get a +2.5 range so they can fight models at max range. PTRS are 40 range but are not worthy on adding it. MG already have the arc, but they have 45 range. (Vicker is basically +10 when garrisoned) Tanks follow the rules of 40/50/60/70/80 range which minor differences been achieved through vet or special units. There could be some argument for 50/60 range vehicles. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic leaves Dawn of War 3 behind8 Mar 2018, 15:53 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Mar 2018, 03:07 AMMistah_S Woah woah, slow down there buddy! C&C has had 7 or so titles already and is been done to death - ok it can die MoH - They've only JUST started doing modern combat. They can take this back to WW1 and even go back to WW2 Eastern Theatre. DS - They could easily crank out another 1 + DLC game. Ultima - NFI SC - again, could do a futuristic or historical feel. C&C: Red Alert, Tiberium wars and Generals were different enough. One of the fathers of the RTS didn't deserve something like C&C 4 TT. Westwood closed and Ex WW didn't make a hit with Grey goo. MoH: Danger close has been shut down. MoH was supposed to be the title which goes in between years for BF, but as it latest one was a failure, it got replaced with Titan Fall/Battlefront/BF parody aka Hardline. DS: sorry but Visceral game closed last year. While it wasn't a total failure, they didn't hit the mark with DS3. SimCity: the last SC had a total failure release which lead to closing Maxis studios. All those games has seen their studios shut down. Just check here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_Arts#Defunct In: Lobby
Thread: The OKW Puma7 Mar 2018, 15:55 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Mar 2018, 11:13 AMVipper Pls return to the subject of OKW Puma In: Lobby
Thread: Making combined arms viable6 Mar 2018, 23:33 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Mar 2018, 05:10 AMmortiferum I generally find vickers to have really crappy suppression not because it "doesnt suppress", but rather because it "kills" a model right off the bat, takes time to re-aim, then fire and "suppress" the squad it is shooting at. I'll add: while all MGs suffer from mid/late game plenty of yellow cover available, this makes the vicker a joke in comparison. I think this will be my plea for CoH3. Make a new category for yellow cover. ON MAP pre generated light cover remains the same, but player created light cover through small ordnance such as ballistic and indirect fire, should not grant suppression benefits. At most, leave that to REALLY heavy offmap or maybe onmap Howitzers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: About Jacksons6 Mar 2018, 23:25 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Mar 2018, 17:49 PMStug life First here https://languagetool.org/ second p4 Reload duration 5.3 - 5.7 jackson reload 4.375/4.975; p4 speed 6.3 acc 2.1 jack speed 6.5 acc 3 and jackson get 0.75 moving accuracy and has enough armor to bounce p4 shot (115 pen vs jackson armor 130), so no p4 is not the counter to jackson the only somewhat counter right now is the jagdp4 but it still can't chase it and still miss it on the move Something that people forget when mentioning reload, is that it's not the only factor in RoF. Jackson with PV n Su76 (can't remember if any other tank) have wind up/down. This is the current RoF: FF: 8.25s OKW PV: 7.5s (wind) OH PV: 6.65 (wind) Jackson: 6.55 (wind) Su85: 5.65 JPIV: 5 Su76: 4.275 (wind) Stug: 4.25 In: COH2 Gameplay