Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: pzgren should be wehr's dedicated tank hunters26 Mar 2018, 19:08 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2018, 00:53 AMsinthe I think the t34/76 should have the armour of the t34/85 and the difference between the 2 is the up'd gun and a minor armour increase (10). Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2018, 00:01 AMthedarkarmadillo Tbh i think thats a good thing, the mg thing should be standard so the AOE of the cannons could be slightly reduced. Then tanks are a reliable threat instead of an RNG machine. Nothing sucks more than flanking an AT gun and missing shots for the next minute and netting nothing. I didn't explained myself enough. T3485 was on a fine spot, specially after guard commanders fell out of popularity/effectiveness compare to the past. Performance was fine when they moved it to T4. When they necessarily buffed the MGs on the T34-76s, it did have a echo effect on buffing the 85s as well. I said this like 2 years ago, it was mostly an oversight. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: pzgren should be wehr's dedicated tank hunters25 Mar 2018, 23:04 PM T34-85s only problem comes from having the same MG profile as the 76s. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is OKW dead? what's your opinion? 25 Mar 2018, 22:59 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2018, 23:51 PMTheGentlemenTroll Some Competitive games do create tweak around a lower ranked player base. For example, in league they do tune some champions who are considered stronger in lower elo when compared to high elo to create a more pleasant experience for a majority of the player base. Most of the time though the wishes of the higher elo players correlate with lower elo players which make it easier to create patches. Correct me if i'm wrong, but that generally applies to niche heroes who are really oppressive in low elos. You are not going to see a core champ who is contested in high elo buffed, because low ELO players can't use it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How would you change coh 2?24 Mar 2018, 17:20 PM 1- 6-9 commanders top for each faction. Commanders should complement a faction, not define it. See Soviets for the last 4 years. 2- Theatre of war, or whatever Co-op mode. See SC2 success with commanders. 3- Gamble with an archon mode. Basically 2 people can control the same army. It would be a 1v1 (4 players) and 2v2 mode (8p). 4- Dynamic queue. First of all: let people search as random faction for the best match making possibilities and time. Second: adding to the archon mode, let "solo" people cross a checkbox if they want to face people doing archon. Top 50 players can wipe the floor against most other players but maybe 2 rank 500 guys can put a fight. 5 n 6- Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2018, 13:47 PMZombiFrancis Global fuel upgrades. Mapmaking assets that provide more territory point options (low, high resources, etc.) 7- Make a different balance mode for 3v3+ or look for alternative ways of making the mode less spammy. 8- Remove radio silence ability from community manager. Buff rate of fire on patch updates. 9- Hotfix: recruit someone like Cruzz, who can check the game for ninja horrors. On a serious note: PTR/beta server to test future releases. Give incentives (supply/skins/medals/whatever) or recognize people who reports bugs, even more so for those who actually list the reproduce steps. Want to go a mile further? Give content for those who actually find a way to actually FIX them. Something as simple as a special decal or portrait. 10- On a simil note to rewarding contributing players, improve dynamic with mapmakers. When playing on automatch, let players automatically filter/veto (if they desire) all community maps which are on "test" mode. This would let mapmakers actually get more feedback out of it. Add a small survey after playing on them. You could increase "xp" or currency gain when playing in these test maps or when giving feedback. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is OKW dead? what's your opinion? 24 Mar 2018, 16:54 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2018, 00:38 AMStorm Elite Who discusses balance in the context of anything other than 1vs1? 90% of the playerbase. My opinion is: you balance around 1v1 and fine tune upwards while adjusting problematic units, abilities and combinations which are not something you'll see on 1v1. I'll also refute in some other way: who discusses balance in the context of anything other than good players play or people who can use things effectively? In any other game or genre you would dismiss anyone who is not around Master/Diamond or basically top 1%/10% (here it would translate to around rank50/150). The trick been that you make things easier to use for that 90% but at the same time, trying to keep the depth and skill ceiling high. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers24 Mar 2018, 16:38 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2018, 15:45 PMZombiFrancis I don't think the HT changed itself, but the change in tiers made it come incredibly faster than it ever had in the past. That timing was what warranted the Quad HT to lose reinforcement, (and by extension the flameHT, which made sense, but was mostly a retroactive punishment for the unit being so prominent in the early days. A lot of units have been buffed or nerfed on those grounds unfortunately.) Thxfully we have the changelog thread and it's as easy as doing a control + F. 3 changes made it good. - Soviet rework. The whole dichotomy of only getting 2 tiers, made the vehicle tiers arrive at a certain point which limited lighter ones. Putting M5, T70 and Su76 on same tier, allowed it to arrive at a sensible time. - 200% buff to suppression. Yeah, it was bad. - 50% buff to damage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers23 Mar 2018, 18:02 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2018, 17:02 PMthedarkarmadillo T3 should be osts main emding tier. T4 should be an escalation to break the stalemate should it be required. The main problem with t4 is that its a 2 part price that doesnt give you anything unless you pay both part THEN also have to buy a unit. Compare to okw who get their boons with teching (some have an additonal cost for sure, but its fairly small at least and optional) usf gets squads with teching that come with pre-installed munitions upgrades and some support abilities, brits get arty then all the juicy buffs for hammer/anvil as well. For WFA teching not only unlocks new units but also raises their power baseline, its actually an escalation of power. Ironicly "battle phase" system does no such thing. Which is a god damned shame. Because it could be simple things like -5% rec acc for infantry or an extra medic on med bunkers or a small reduction in cost for say the lmg 42 or faster repair for pios. The options are endless AND theres 7 (!!$!!!!!!) Places they could integrate (each tier and the 3 BP) to work out timing Its a god damned shame... This is how i would have seen a reworked OH (not gonna bother trying to mention cost) -Swap the current status of BP and Tiers. You'll need T1>T2>T3>T4 but BP could be unlocked at any pace. -T1 remains the same. -T2 gives access to the current benefits of BP1 (rifle grenade, LMG). It only unlocks PG, pak and 221. -BP1 unlocks 222, bundle nade/pschrechk, 252 HT with flamer upgrade. Things here could be swap around. -T3 comes with Ostwind and Stug. It would arrive slightly faster. -BP2 unlocks PIV (MAYBE it comes with PIV chubby version) and Panzerwerfer on T3. It would arrive slightly later. -T4 comes with PV and Brumbar and is more of a bonus tech option, just as current UKF. -BP3 could be the upgrade on the long cannon for PIV, extra pio member on squad, 82HP grens, etc. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: no Counter for OKW and Wehrmacht Tank destroyers23 Mar 2018, 17:38 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Mar 2018, 23:44 PMZombiFrancis T3 had all the AI (HT, T70, T34), and T4 had the AT and arti. (SU-85, SU-76, Katyusha) This made the SU-76 hilariously stupid to get, and the HT and T70 arriving typically too late compared to the usefulness of an actual piece of armor. But the t70 could also crush for a period at this time, so that was a major advantage. And as it was already stated, calling in the T34/85 battlegroup was almost always a better choice than going T4 for unturreted AT options. Hence T4 wasn't really used for except for luxury rocket artillery. Kinda like Ostheer T4 nowadays (still.) Current tech system and unit selection is way superior. A bit more of clarity and information about that time. All factions started with less manpower for some time and tech was really expensive. This made call ins an even better choice. Early on during release: games were defined by either vet 2 flamer HT or holding with guards n rushing T70 with crush. Shocks OP as well. When that shit was fixed and games lasted a bit more than 7mins, you would had the choice as Soviets of getting only 2 tech buildings, due to cost. Without taking into account specifically 1v1, you would either get T2 into T3 or T1 into T4. Remember that clowncar and double snipers were strong, and that Su85 reverse speed and sight was a joke. You couldn't always relied on waiting for CPs and going for the double T3485s. Same if you were winning and wanted to close the deal. IF you went for Cons spam, the only logical move was T2 due to Zis and then either waiting for call in tanks or getting T3. There were some all ins with T1 into T3, because T1 was slightly cheaper. Su76 has always been a meme unit till they buff it (like 3 years). HT got at some point to be a strong unit, but i'm not sure if that was after the rework on the tiers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Carolina Mastretta is new lead game designer COH team19 Mar 2018, 12:53 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Mar 2018, 22:47 PMValeran Ehm, Age of MOBA 4? DOTA of Heroes 3? Age of empires 3, card system all over again In: Lobby
Thread: pzgren should be wehr's dedicated tank hunters18 Mar 2018, 07:37 AM What about bolster but with limitations. Like only been able to change it near your base or with a heavy cd which can't be activated during combat or after a long time after it? In: COH2 Balance