Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Help ! - Lag or delay problem (multiplayer)27 May 2018, 17:13 PM Jump back to quoted post27 May 2018, 01:54 AMskemshead Funny how you talk about isolated cases, because almost every stream I watch I witness players with lag and many of these player live in USA. You probably don't notice the issue because your more of a forum warrior but any one who plays often will tell you the lag is present in almost every game, it's just people have given up complaining because relic can't/won't fix it. And don't start on about battle servers and how the lag will be the same irrespective of where my opponent lives because there is a noticeable difference when I play Asians and Russians. Because even if you live just besides the server, the game has a small input delay added into it. I live in Buenos Aires, and i have a physical avg of 180 ping to NY (haven't done a s specific ping to the servers). That's bad but playable. ANY small FPS drop or desync from time to time, can make those lag spikes horrible. NOW, if you are living in Australia, guess what, you are geographically in one of the worst places to be in the world, to connect to NY. MAYBE the battle servers have issues in order to handle 2 incoming connections with +250 ping. But the only real solution ANY GAME applies is having more servers because you can't go around increasing the speed of light. But that can never be applied to a small game like CoH. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Help ! - Lag or delay problem (multiplayer)25 May 2018, 17:34 PM It's been +4 years and still people talk about lag because of other players. There's a single battle server located in US (New York ?), so for anyone outside of USA, there's gonna be lag or some kind of input delay (apart from the ingame small input delay). If your ISP sucks, bad luck. If the region node has problems, it sucks. If for some reason the international submarine cables have a problem, it sucks. "But i don't have problems in XYZ game". Well it might be because they have a regional server which is closer to where you live. On a personal level, don't use WIFI if possible, specially if you are prone to have interferences. Check if you have any issues and delays with your router. Last option is calling your internet provider. It's not like it's impossible for Relic to have issues with their servers, but if that would be the case, EVERYONE would be complaining about it and not it been isolated cases. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Rumour: Studio Marketing Director Alex Price left relic24 May 2018, 23:01 PM What's GTA ? It's just a generational thing. Give it 10/20 years for people to move the scapegoat into something else. Movies make people violent. TV makes people violent. People are just violent. In: Lobby
Thread: Bring back two man/woman soviet snipers [poll]23 May 2018, 19:55 PM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2018, 14:16 PMShadowLinkX37 IIRC WPC occured post june 2016 patch, where USF mortars were laser guided and penal flamers were the meta. If that is correct that'd explain the construction of t1. It was mostly the clunkiness of camouflage from soviet snipers relegating them to been "ambushers" who needed to prep a position in order to counter snipe as opposed to camo on the move. That in combination with 15f 222, which while been even crappier as AI, would provide enough deterrent to T1 play. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does USF start with more resources than OKW?21 May 2018, 17:17 PM Is that really the case? I was under the impression that OKW had a higher total mp start, after they reworked their tech. Reminder that initial resources are basically purely mp wise. That's your initial amount plus the cost/value of your starting unit. Fuelwise is just a matter of timing, cause any faction with a slightly higher or smaller amount, accounts for either sidegrades or basically min 0 teching (OH/SU). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remember when ...17 May 2018, 11:50 AM Oh come on OP, you can do better. Why ignore the most game breaking issues, from both sides, and just mention petty things. Some old post with some additions. NOTABLE bug mention: -Never forget #vetgate. Cause who cares about veterancy bonuses, so we break it even more when we try to fix it at first. It's not like we had a tournament or something. -1 squad. +50 models of Rear Echelons. -Superman bug aka Stacking bugs. Also Super Sherman. Or mega M42 AT gun, which would kill whatever, if it managed to pen. -When destroying a medical crate, it would call artillery over that position. -200 yards Vickers. We have come a long way since release. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: about grens rifle nade.15 May 2018, 21:39 PM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2018, 19:57 PMSander93 When models are clumped in cover, sometimes the rifle grenades kill 50-100% of the squad and other times they do like 50% health damage with no model drops. For the same kind of hits. Because people perceive something as random, it doesn't mean it's random at all. Heavy cover reduces explosive damage by 50% when the direction of the grenade comes from the opposite side. LETHAL AoE (80dmg) is small (0.75) but mid range damage is still 60dmg (1.5). Normal nades follow the same damage profile but with different distance (1-2-3) and radius. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Firefly and Jackson are too good15 May 2018, 19:09 PM Jackson is good. Firefly has cheese, but it's not as good vanilla. But neither stands up against cost efficiency and RoF of the Stug. Stug is love, stug is ife. OKW is rolling with light vehicles AI or/and then transitioning to PIVs and JPIVs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Would You Change How USF Techs?:15 May 2018, 18:50 PM Yes, if this was a possibility 2 years ago. At most i could see some units been swapped. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Just curiosity, what happened to all the criticals?15 May 2018, 18:41 PM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2018, 18:19 PMTobis I would have preferred if they reworked blizzards, but the current implementation was awful. You had exactly 60 seconds to prepare, that's nothing. You had time to make some firepits and cry in a house for 5 minutes while the blizzard passed. Infantry play basically stopped for minutes at a time in a match because it was just too slow and risky to make any plays because your troops would freeze to death on retreat lol. Firepits even cost manpower so you would lose income by just moving around the map. It actively promoted just camping on the resources you had and gaining passive income with no action, and your opponent probably did the same thing. They could have made the blizzards have a countdown from the start of the match, like 8 mins worth on a timer. That would easily have made the blizzards much more interesting tactics wise. They went with straight removal, which is kinda lame but still better than keeping them in. Same thing i say every time this theme pop ups. -Limit the randomness on appearance and duration of blizzards. -Free firepits. No xp associated with them. Just add a cooldown. -Cold immunity was stupid, same as some units without heavy snow penalties. -More player interaction with deep snow and ice. If you could permanently removed deep snow, at least until a blizzard pop up, through the use of vehicles or fire based sources (flamethrower, firepits, molotov) that would had been better as you could prepare "retreat routes". -No model deaths during blizzards but heavy offensive/defensive penalties instead. Nothing worst than losing units on retreats -Blizzard should make ice basically immune to destruction to allow for flanking maneuvers through frozen rivers. -You should be able to conceal units on deep snow. etc. In: COH2 Gameplay