Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: USF Riflemen kinda fix.26 Jun 2019, 06:21 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2019, 22:29 PMStug life the problem lies in the okw starting MP reduce it and u fix it Expanding on it. You remove around ±30mp from the initial mp pool and you give it back in cost on the SwS. This slows downs OKW Volk production and fielding while still maintaining the total tech cost for the faction. USF struggles against OKW cause you are fighting RET vs SP as your starter unit. Then either Kubel gets cap speed and/or you get outspammed early on by Volks. Volks basically trade evenly against Rifles unless Rifles manage to engage them below 20 range. Whoever is defensive is more likely to win unless Rifles can approach from blind points. OKW usually gets 4 units + SP. Then techs. USF usually gets 3 units + RET. Around 2:30 they will tech towards one of their officers. It takes 70s till the officer arrives. This is when you get an edge as OKW against USF. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Bug Report for Commander patch25 Jun 2019, 18:09 PM Just saw a comment saying that merging conscripts into PPSH Penals, leave the models without weapons. In: Lobby
Thread: 15 min ele/jagdtiger25 Jun 2019, 03:46 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2019, 23:12 PMKiwiBirb F in chat for heavy crush SWS supply trucks SwS with crush >>>>> sleeps. SwS with invisible mgs >>>> woke AF. In: Lobby
Thread: What do you find Un-fun about coh2?24 Jun 2019, 23:18 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2019, 21:35 PMWingZero The best part is to see toxic people say "ez" when they win a game by 2 points lol! That's just basic trolling 101 not toxic XD Win by 500 VP >>> Ufff, too hard. Win by less than 50 VP >>> GG, EZPZ. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 15 min ele/jagdtiger24 Jun 2019, 19:02 PM Because you need a JT to counter T70s and the like right? In: Lobby
Thread: Ostheer T2 Skip24 Jun 2019, 18:49 PM I think the skip has weakness in 1v1, but is way more flexible for 2v2 and upwards for obvious reasons. Previously, Ostwind was not worth and the time to get a PIV left you vulnerable for far too long, making the skip of T2 not a reality. 222 is nice against heavy clowncar, Dodge, Brens, as well as soft counter or supporting killing other lights as the game progress. But if you can kill or deal with them, i don't think there's too much of a need to get one. 251 FHT is great, but it also requires a hefty munition investment (which can be spent elsewhere for similar long term results aka infantry upgrades). The whole thing that makes T2 skip worth, is getting the Ostwind. It would be interesting to see what is the fuel gap between the arrival of the T70 (only T1, T2 + AT nade/molo or T1 + T2) and Ostwind. I feel like the natural punish unit for this kind of strats are either not seeing use, not worth the cost or have limited timeframe to do so. Ex: M20-AAHT-Greyhound, call in and non doc M5 Quad. The Stuart/Aec are not disruptive enough to merit getting T2, more so if it will delay you from getting a real med to deal with the Ost. It's like getting a Puma for map control and then crying when you see a Centaur on the enemy team. I think more time has to pass to see where the meta finally settles down. If small adjustments are done to the Flakpanzer, i don't think any change in the tech must be done. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Move Conscripts 7th man from t4 to t3?21 Jun 2019, 16:24 PM There's intention and there is execution. "No plan survives first contact with the enemy". Finally if one accept that "balance" wise thing are better that does not prove that everything at that was wrong. The opposite also applies. Just because something is written in the changelog doesn't mean it did apply correctly and with the intention they had in mind. At some point, you just need to let it go. It's a game design vision from someone who doesn't work anymore with Relic, we are at a stage on which another faction was introduced, 2 factions got complete revamps and 2 others saw different changes to their teching and their units. You can't just cut quote something which sounds nice while ignoring that in their grand vision design, factions were either supposed to steamroll and snowball the game to finish early or be condemned to lose because they didn't manage to reduce the opponents VP to a low amount that no wonder unit would save them (USF vs OKW). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Problems of flanking tanks21 Jun 2019, 15:49 PM The problem is the reason you play those modes. There is more players, there is a higher volume of units involved. Unless you want to force that everyone have half total popcap so at most you are using the same amount of units field as 2v2, you would never solve the issue. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What do you find Un-fun about coh2?20 Jun 2019, 16:27 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Jun 2019, 10:45 AMsynThrax But these are my cnc, sc2 roots speaking My perspective from someone watching SC2 occasionally: i think the macro games are way more prominent now, which means longer games. Ontopic: number of players which means localised servers not been a thing. Imagine having close to no delay in your inputs. If we had a bigger playerbase, more people would be playing on equal terms. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: IL-2 Love ya.20 Jun 2019, 16:13 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Jun 2019, 15:10 PMblvckdream "Fun and cool tactic" ---> Press 2 buttons. Very fun and cool indeed. It could be worse, it could be just 1 button. In: COH2 Gameplay