Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Mediums to panther/tank destroyer interactions 6 Jul 2019, 02:27 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2019, 23:41 PMLago The Pershing's even squishier and it's one of the best tanks in the game. Cause it's mobile and has insane AI? 60f and mp for only 160HP and some firepower? Comet is calling, he doesn't want his title of worst tank stolen. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mediums to panther/tank destroyer interactions 5 Jul 2019, 22:20 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2019, 20:14 PMStug life i think he is talking about team game where TD coverage is omnipresent as it’s x4 Then it doesn't make sense to compare units on a 1v1 basis. The way it's worded sounds like a 1v1 scenario. Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2019, 21:00 PMinsaneHoshi That requires you to have constant knowledge of where the TD is, does it not? See above. A single TD on a whole map can move so much as deter as well. Getting AT sole units is a safe move that won't win you games but won't make lose neither because you are unprepared. It's the same as getting a shock light vehicle or stalling to a medium tank. Getting an Ostwind instead of PIV. Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2019, 21:56 PMLago Tank destroyers only need to be in their current state because they need to counter heavy tanks. If we toned down all the heavies (Panther included), we could tone down the tank destroyers too. And how do you tone heavies down while keeping them desirable to use? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What Role Should Heavy Tanks Serve?5 Jul 2019, 20:10 PM Can you guys go back to topic? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mediums to panther/tank destroyer interactions 5 Jul 2019, 20:06 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2019, 19:48 PMStug life Medium do give shock value and anti infantry, and if ur dominance with AI is big u can use AT infantry to deal with TD Or you can exploit the map so you attack wherever the TD is not. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Official forum ?5 Jul 2019, 18:48 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Jul 2019, 17:40 PMpvtgooner What's wrong with Reddit? Reddit as a platform discussion is bad most of the time cause it's not designed for it. On the other hand it has other strengths to it. In: COH2 Central
Thread: Machine Guns5 Jul 2019, 18:45 PM The original design was a heavily mobile SUPPRESSION platform, on a faction which lacks both non doctrinally units and flexibity to get different tiers of units. An MG is supposed to suppress units, not do damage. If that was not the case, suppression wouldn't buff the resistance when units go prone into the ground. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sega Makes Fun Of EA’s ‘Surprise Mechanics'4 Jul 2019, 19:28 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2019, 15:25 PMCrecer13 No, warspoils were added about two years later (I do not remember exactly) the appearance of the game, before that the commanders were bought for real money. And I would even now buy really new commanders with new abilities and techniques, because without new content, the game becomes more boring and boring to play. Even worst, you had no supply income before and duplicates were a thing. So it wasn't rare that you could get multiple of the same commanders been dropped. In: Lobby
Thread: Machine Guns3 Jul 2019, 20:54 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jul 2019, 15:44 PMThe amazing Chandler Thanks for that. You of all people defending a smarta@@. Start reading: I play and follow COH since 2006, since the first day. So maybe i know stuff that maybe you never seen or heard before, so don’t be dogmatic. I am 1000 % sure that i read a post in this forum from a developer that said that they could fix it but… they will not because of what i wrote in my earlier post and some other details. And say for argument sake that this is not true, they still could have fixed this by changing the MG YEARS AGO. Yeah, maybe now it’s too late for that but i don’t give a shit and i want to express my disappointment towards them. And one last thing, don’t believe everything that the developers say to us, sometimes it’s easier to tell a small lie to cover something else (no time, no money, no eagerness to change something). You are still wrong. The argument was: the maxim is strong and the deathloop and 6 man crew kinda balances it out. Different devs and balance team have come and go and the maxim deathloop isn't something that can be fixed. We have users who had helped fixed bugs and issues with the game and they said they can't be fixed. There's no big conspiracy here. There were changes implemented in order to "mitigate" the deathloop but that's just a mechanic working as intended with poor gameplay consequences. There's no way to give it teleporting german technology so the only thing that can be done is reduce the target prioritization of the guy operating the weapon. I might be missing something around but all wheel based support weapons suffer the same thing. Finally: change the MG to what? We barely got new content and you expect for them to create new models and voicing from thing air? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For the Love Of God M1 Pack Howitzer 2 Jul 2019, 21:26 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2019, 18:41 PMEsxile snip Less/no mortar and more Howitzer. Player input >>> Random AA fire effectiveness. If ALL MORTARS hadn't been nerfed, i wouldn't say shit about the Pack Howi because that's where the power level of passive indirect fire was meant to be. All mortars had been nerfed and serve now specific purpose rather than, i have MP let's build a mortar so i can passively get bleeding on my opponent. The problem is that it's closer to having the snipe capabilities of the ISG (rather than a normal mortar) while having the profile AoE of the 120mm. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: For the Love Of God M1 Pack Howitzer 2 Jul 2019, 17:26 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2019, 16:42 PMpvtgooner Why does USF continue to have to pay a price with increased micro concentration simply because OST wants to never move their units out of cover? I understand asymmetric balance but its hilarious playing a game with USF and then playing an OST one right after. Legit feels like you could fall asleep playing the germans. USF would have no good artillery until major(!!!) when the scott could potentially come out but now you're spending fuel to get a decent IDF unit while axis GrWs and LeiGs walk all over your team weapons. To me this conversation is a non starter and we're only having this conversation because the literal same user keeps making the exact same thread over and over. ALL early/mid game indirect units were made weaker on auto attack and in general. I don't see why the Pack Howie shouldn't follow the same and made it so it's better in barrage and weaker in AA. Specially to differentiate it from the cheaper mortar. Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2019, 16:24 PMGrim If the enemy has an OKW on their team that pretty much negates all support weapon play for a start. If a OKW Schwerer HQ rework was possible (half tech), i wonder if the Stuka could see a rework as well. Wild idea incoming: -Reduce cost to mortar HT levels. -Remove HE barrage and instead replace it with flame barrage instead (improve if necessary) no muni cost. -After unlocking first half of Flak HQ, you can upgrade the Stuka to it's previous version for the difference in cost, to unlock HE barrage. In: COH2 Balance