Profile of elchino7

Why everyone is too whiny about this while brits have the better version, sov has it on sniper and mortar...

1 click vision in any part of the map, without risking a unit been on the front to do so.
This wine has aged well, cause it's been there since 5 years ago.

nah mg 34 can stay locked but ober them self should come earlier, without mg34 they perform similar to penal

2 options:

1 decrease the cost of tier 4 to 20-40 fuel and add the jp4 to it too, increase PA cost to 100-80 fu

2 decrease the cost to tier 4 to 30 fuel make it so it can be built first like other trucks, increase cost of PA to 90 and make it so it needs 2 truck to be upgraded

like this they come only a bit later than pgreen and not way after a t-70

It's not gonna happen what you suggest. Make it more realistic.

While the current approach seems to be cautious due to other changes been applied to the game and waiting to see where OKW meta will go after Spec Ops has been call in nerfed, i think MoD already said that they thought about making the JPIV linked with Obers.

I think it would had been much better a 80f Schwerer with Obers + LMG34 unlocked coming with JPIV. P. acquisition as a one time thing to buy which unlocks tanks forever and the Flak gun as something which has to be re-bought if the Flak HQ is destroyed.

If OKW ends up been weak in this meta, this is something that could be tried.

PD: are their K98 supposed to have passive suppression ?

I am perfectly aware of that but with the USF tech changes there is little reason for non vetted AP rounds for these HMG. It can be moved to vet 1 and be consistent with axis hmgs.

It could be done, but then you should give the same bonuses. At the moment they are all different.
IIRC: Dhska is only pen, .50cal is 25%dmg +base pen and IR +100%dmg +base pen.


-All flares should reveal camouflaged squads. (NOTE: OKW artillery flares don't reveal, which i thought they did)
-All the boost performance and give infantry speed doctrinal abilities. Performance + cost. As been discussed on other threads, i think it's better to remove sprint while in combat.
-Don't think so but i'll mention it: MG upgrade cost for tanks.

Some interesting planes interactions:
-This is still up.
https://www.coh2.org/topic/83547/vision-offmap-planes
It only applies to planes which can provide vision on their own.
-Planes, as entities, seems able to reveal cloaked unit as any other normal unit if the plane pass over a camouflaged unit, if you have vision over the area.

-OH:
Incendiary bombing run works as a recon plane in the same manner as Stuka Smoke bombs. Both of them don't extended reveal zones (camo).
Stuka AT strafe provides vision. Not suppression one.
-SU:
Airborne Guards IL2 provides vision
Mark Vehicle: provides small vision but extended detection range.
IL2 bombing, strafing and rocket provides vision.
-OKW:
Stuka smoke bomb doesn't get extended detection range.
Airborne assault AI planes provide vision.
Sector assault none of them.

I got tired but sometime i will continue this.

I was joking with ya m80, just taking the piss with the idea of repair options that cost "manpower".

I thought about manpower cause early on, you don't want to spend precious muni on the repair ability.
Manpower would be a sort of "bleeding", making you either waste time with repairs or simply "reinforce/repair" it for a cost. It would make the units more self sustained, specially towards later stages of the game.

I have a kinda unrelated suggestion.

What if all light vehicles, at least the ones which already has some sort of self repair at some point, would had it at vet0 and it would cost mp instead of munition?