Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: 2v2s just feel like an upward battle for axis25 Apr 2020, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2020, 11:01 AMoootto92 Getting 5 men pios from the get go would even more put the nail on the coffin of grens as a viable early game unit. Now skipping T1 and going straight for pgrens would be even stronger. Non doctrinal 5 men pio upgrade is a great idea but the upgrade needs to be tied to T3 or T4 My idea was for BP3/T4. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Call in Meta25 Apr 2020, 15:20 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2020, 11:50 AMDonnieChan you should ve seen this game 4 years ago What, you didn't like infinte T34-85s vs infinite Tigers ? TBH, in the case of Greyhound, if they were gonna remove the "call in", it would be arriving sooner than now. What would be the point of having the unit when you can either get a Stuart/AA HT depending on officer choice. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Skill planes25 Apr 2020, 15:13 PM My view on skillplanes for CoH3 would be to make them loiter around first during the map on approach and then let the player have X number of times to allow them to manually strafe something. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Changes i feel grens need25 Apr 2020, 04:35 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2020, 01:41 AMporkloin IIRC there's 14 standard territories on General mud. There's 10 standard territories on most 1v1s except crossroads and nexus in the 1v1 map pool. This comes out to a 20% increase in fuel income though my numbers might be a bit off since it's been like a month since I looked into it. Factor in resource caches and you've got a massive difference in fuel incomes. While the unit density does play a large role in balancing team games, standardizing the resources would make things an order of magnitude easier for balance, and it's really not that hard to do. That depends on a map by map basis. While the stats are quite old, the game dynamics hasn't change that much so it would still be relevant. https://www.coh2.org/topic/61229/resource-income-per-game-mode Teamgames do end up getting more resources but the breaking point seems around pass the 12 min mark. As i said before, the main problem with teamgames resources is that the income is steady and safe. The other problems such as caches, are kinda secondary. It would improve IMO if caches only rewarded the one who build them and anyone could "attach" themselves to an already existing cache by paying the same amount. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Changes i feel grens need25 Apr 2020, 01:31 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2020, 00:39 AMporkloin Non-doctrinal 5 man is just standardizing a game based on asymmetrical balance. People wouldn't care nearly as much if the balance team actually fixed the economies between 1v1 and team games though. Since team games have more points, and drastically cheaper caches any attempts at balancing around economy are thrown out the window. A prohibitively expensive unit in 1v1 is OP in 4v4, while a cheap unit is OP in 1v1, worthless in 4v4. You can tell who plays team games and who plays 1v1 with one simple question: is panther good? 1v1 players will say no it's worthless, and team game players will say it's end of the world OP. The problem is not amount of points. It's that map control doesn't change as much and cut off might be as well an obsolete concept. It's also about popcap. Each new player adds up to 100 popcap worth of units to a team but the amount of VP and strat points you have to control remains the same. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sturmtiger and ARVE24 Apr 2020, 19:19 PM What about using that high curve barrage as another option for the ST ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Obers STG24 Apr 2020, 01:00 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 23:08 PMLady Xenarra Yes, and then it was changed into two separate upgrade paths. LMG 34 OR the IR StG44s from a stock of Kar 98 only. The LMG was considered vastly too powerful for its apparent free upgrade and thus it was nerfed into having a muni cost. But they never had 4 IR STG. Obers were made to have their LMG cost muni cause the alternative was making them impossible high to buy and reinforce to justify the performance. Comparing LMG34 vs IR STG is wonky cause it's 2 weapons vs 1 and the accuracy modifiers which comes to play mostly during mid to late game (when everything is light cover). So the better comparison would be 1 LMG34 + Ober Kar vs 2 IR STG. With an edge on equal values towards the LMG due to focusing models down. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: CoH3 will be MODERN WARFARE ??????24 Apr 2020, 00:06 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 21:03 PMDoomlord52 Possibly, but also possibly not, if the rest of the game is interesting/strong enough. In any event, going up to 'The Tunisia Campaign' would allow for Tigers and Shermans. As for BF5, people don't like it because it's just a bad game; missing content, full of bugs, poorly balanced, and an incredibly inconsistent adherence to theme. It was a combination of both. Since day 1, people were asking why not iconic battles and they were assure they would come as it would be a "live" service game going progressively through the war. Look at what happens when they pull the plug. In: Lobby
Thread: Obers STG23 Apr 2020, 22:16 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 21:20 PMLady Xenarra Still miss the days when it was 4 StGs as the upgrade and not just 2 but I think the LR dps was truly abysmal for that version back then. That was never the case. They used to come with LMG34 by default and you could upgrade on top of that the IR STG. People make the mistake in assuming that because they have STG they are forced to assault positions. Just like with PG and Falls, you are better playing them on cover and assault only when the opposing unit has low dps. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sturmtiger and ARVE23 Apr 2020, 16:38 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2020, 16:14 PMSully I think the ship has sailed on it getting a complete redesign. Better off suggesting smaller changes that are easy to implement. In: COH2 Balance