Profile of zarok47

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 587

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Zarok47
Steam: 76561198007472278


Thread: General 2v2 Advice11 May 2018, 17:58 PM Jump back to quoted post11 May 2018, 08:47 AM\|GB\| The Lnt.599 Imo it depends on how u define the term teamplay. If teamplay for u is you and your teamm8 being present all around the map (the VonSildur/HooliMan god mode style) it would kick in only top 30. But i think teamplay is already there if you got your tank at the right moment there to help your teamm8 out, or you got your units on the spot where the enemy is about to flank. Or when u do a single combined push on one of your opponents. For example i played with a friend of mine against wuff and some other guy yesterday, me and my friend were both struggling until i shifted to the side of my friend as well (and forgo our fuel point) to help him destroy a sovjet stronghold. we completely demolished my friends opponent (together), which allowed us to get back in to the game. These kinda actions were you play together qualify as teamplay too imo. so since i am not top 30 i disagree with the statement that teamplay only kicks in the crême de la crême of the ladder. My point is that teamplay is important and also can be a crucial factor on lower levels. (it might not be the godmode teamplay of the guys i named ealier but it is still teamplay and will win u games if u work together on the right moment) TEAMPLAY MATTERS! Oh it's certainly usefull, but AT already implies a level of coordination (picking suitable factions) and working from there. True teamplay is communcations, similair pushing and coordination strategy and attacks, all of which is not needed untill said top 30 (heck, the best 2vs2 team every, asten and jove, never so much as spoke to eachother and they are still kicked ass, so even in top level it's not as needed). What is needed in 2vs2 (AT) is a. rushing the house b. winning the arty war. Get that down and you don't need teamplay 95% of the time. So in a sense, we agree I think, just disagree on definition and necessity. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread11 May 2018, 17:54 PM Jump back to quoted post10 May 2018, 09:46 AMElSlayer Save it for the steam forums, emotional over the top strawmans are pathetic. Jump back to quoted post10 May 2018, 17:20 PMelchino7 Except when T1 on Soviet didn't had AT on the form of penals, and OH sniper was wrecking soviet snipers because 222 cost was brought down so you couldn't realistically use M3 to oppose it. Even if 222 was crap as AI due to bugs, 444 made it more than enough against T1 and T70, even when it was OP. Usually your posts are contructive and well thought out, but this part i simply cannot follow. Would you kindly take another look at it? Jump back to quoted post10 May 2018, 17:20 PMelchino7 Although this was quite in the past (OCF/2016?), it just shows that "imbalance" on soviet snipers is only due to how well you can support it (Guards) and how well counters units are during the meta. Support always existed in the form of AT nades on cons, mines to lay and other counters such as they were buffed or nerfed. Killing (and thereby countering the sniper) has always been a thing of another sniper. Jump back to quoted post10 May 2018, 17:20 PMelchino7 Best timeline: they found ways to nerf Soviet sniper assymetrically Acceptable timeline: since they are ubber buffing counters, no sniper sees play. Darkest timeline: making 1man 82HP with mobile cloak and quasi OH RoF, makes Soviet sniper even worst and we enter the era of sniper spam wars. This does not follow, Is the sov sniper buffed or nerfed in total? since apperently we're getting sniper wars (why?) but somehow the sov sniper is worse off? As a question to you: Why is it nice to have a sniper that dies to RNG shells but harder to countersnipe? That's just double the frustration, none of the skill. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: General 2v2 Advice10 May 2018, 13:40 PM It's more important to rush strategic houses and get the right commanders/hardcopunters, teamplay only really kicks in at top 30 play. Jump back to quoted post10 May 2018, 12:45 PMSturmpanther So teamplay and some arty Not some, arty rules 2vs2. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread10 May 2018, 08:27 AM Jump back to quoted post10 May 2018, 07:01 AMKatitof Snipers are NOT meant to fight each other. Just like HMGs or TDs aren't meant to fight each other. Sniper wars is one of the most cancerous COH1 things. Sniper issues could be equally efficiently solved by changing rec acc. Except the only counters to snipers at high level has always been another sniper. (ost vs brits, ost vet 1 vs sov sniper and vice versa). Then we got ele vs su-86, stug vs su-76, firefly vs stug's/jp4 and more. So that is plain wrong. Sov sniper at 2 man is RNG infested frustration that dies to mortar but survives infantry. It should be the other way around which is going to be achieved with the upcoming change. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW stuka balance (possibly OP)?8 May 2018, 17:23 PM Ah yes, this thread again. Stuka has one job: counter team weapons. It does it very well. Infantry can laugh at the stuka tho, since all you need to do is move slightly. Unless it's on a bridge map, but who the fuck thinks bridge maps are balanced? The stuka is balanced. It is fun? I would say all indirect fire is cancer atm. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: a genera question about 1vs1 4 May 2018, 09:02 AM Use skillplanes and arty at the same time as you attack. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: give strumpio 2 kar98k4 May 2018, 08:57 AM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2018, 08:39 AMcheese tonkatsu it's a metaphore. and i know they won't listen about cons pssh. Not with this attitude. Go make a thread about the ppsh change, I'll help you out and give contrucive feedback there. EDIT: Yee 500 posts, I am truly a waster of time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Your thought on USF early game3 May 2018, 16:55 PM Jump back to quoted post3 May 2018, 13:50 PMEsxile One other point is if you decide to go Lieutenant, you not going to build more than 3 riflemen squad due to the high upkeep price while with the Otheer is just going heavy T1, Ostheer can pump 1 HMG, 4 Gren and then another HMG and have around the same time than your Lieutenant. At which point you oblitirate him with the LT+m20 combo. That powerspike is what punishes ostheer more than anything and forces ost into fast 222. In: US Forces Strategies
Thread: give strumpio 2 kar98k3 May 2018, 12:26 PM If you want to complain about the ppsh change, complain about the ppsh change. Don't drag other units into it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to deal with Soviet support weapon spam?3 May 2018, 08:33 AM ah okw, always fucked by support weapon play. I would open with 4-5 volks, overwhelm him with sheer numbers since he goes t2 his early game is slow. Then get flak ht, use it aggresivly and don't be afraid to tank an at nade, it will only slow the enemy down amd bleed him of mp. Remember to get a atg, because he will need to go t70/su-76 to stop you. After this, you can go for 2-3 ISG's or go t4 and get a p4, depending on your fuel situation. Don't be afraid to stall behind indirect fire, it's a slow game vs sov t2 but doable. In: OKW Strategies