Profile of zarok47

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 587

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Zarok47
Steam: 76561198007472278


Thread: The MG42 needs to be looked, the allies mg's are dog shit.24 Jun 2018, 16:36 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2018, 16:07 PMSkysTheLimit Do grens and volks not have snares? If their "spamming" maxims they will not have too many cons. Would love to see a replay of a recent maxim spam used against you Got one better: 0 VS Brickman Zarok 13 Maxim example replay by: zarok47 map: Faymonville Approach 1 - In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim example replay24 Jun 2018, 16:34 PM Fun little match I had vs brickman some time past. Showing ye olde maximspam into ISU-152. In: Replays
Thread: The MG42 needs to be looked, the allies mg's are dog shit.24 Jun 2018, 09:59 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Jun 2018, 09:04 AMblvckdream Neither is particularly effective vs Cons and Soviet T2. Zis and Conscript AT nades say hi. Or guards. There is nothing they can't do. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The MG42 needs to be looked, the allies mg's are dog shit.23 Jun 2018, 16:18 PM Eh, mg42 probably is too good but that's one of those things that are balanced with early game grens being weak. Not a fan of that sort of balance. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: GCS2 Barbarossa faction win rate20 Jun 2018, 16:31 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2018, 19:47 PMCruzz Luvnest played Brits on a very good map for Brits (crossing in the woods) against Talisman's OKW and lost. Refero (#1 Brit on ladder) played 3 games as Brits against CreativeName's OST(1 game) and Noggano OKW(2 games) and lost all of them. Must be the players and not the faction. 4 games of brits, and that is enough eh? Apart from that, I also expect you to make the "why every faction that DevM plays is OP" thread today. Since it must be the faction, not the player, the map, the starting positions, the seeds or RNG. Jump back to quoted post20 Jun 2018, 05:24 AMFiresparks That is so utterly retarded it doesn't deserve anymore of a reponse. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: GCS2 Barbarossa faction win rate19 Jun 2018, 18:53 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2018, 18:42 PMJae For Jett I'm interested in the context: who played each faction? Generally, you would assume that whoever has the higher seed would win and get a W for their faction, so if all of the high seeds are playing ostheer, you would assume ostheer would have higher win rates. If I recall, every semi finalist played ostheer and soviets (with vonivan having that one OKW game). For the really concerning 7:1 okw vs ukf matchup, I would assume that its a mix of UKF's balance state, small sample size, and possibly lower seeds playing UKF. I know personally that my first round opponent played UKF for two games. That raises an interesting point, is a weak UK show becuase it's actually weak or does nobody good play UK because they think it weak and therefor creating a weak show? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove the T34/76 model variant with the fuel tanks19 Jun 2018, 17:46 PM Or just reverse an unneeded change. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove the T34/76 model variant with the fuel tanks18 Jun 2018, 15:38 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2018, 07:13 AMDonnieChan Also if you lose a game, it's surely not because you need half a second more to see what tank is on the screen at one moment a game There shouldn't be a half a second more to distinguish a damned tank for no balance reason. It's annoying, poitnless and adds to confusion every time you have to asses the power of the tank you face. (and half a second wasted equals 1 lost fight elsewhere). The argument isn't "why should we remove it" the argument is "why the fuck add it in the first place?" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove the T34/76 model variant with the fuel tanks17 Jun 2018, 17:07 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jun 2018, 16:43 PMSander93 Seriously like how many visual clues do you need In a quick glance, you can't get that info and that is a problem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW HMG3415 Jun 2018, 19:00 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2018, 02:44 AMCieZ Why are Guards so good but Pgrens are so average? Why is the Ost mortar so good but the USF mortar so average? Why is the PAK so good but the USF At gun so bad? Guards are too good. Ost mortar got nerfed, USF mortar got range increase A 70 range atg it not bad, the captain tech is lackluster (or LT too good, take your pick). Units being too bad, or too good should be balanced, not kept in their artifical state for "reasons". Else you get the current brits. Furthermore, OkW already suffers vs support weapon spam while having lackluster support weapons (with the exception of the vet 2 rak that becomes OP). Keeping the mg34 below every other mg (yes that includes the maxim) without reason seems weird to me especially considering the power of the 50 call, or the insanity of the vet 1 vickers/mg42 (or my maximspam). Every unit should be viable to use, not something you "have" to get in other to get something as fundamental as suppresion or garrison clearing (looking at you wasp). As is, the mg34 is barely functional and pales in comparison to every other mg. Giving it actual damage would go a long way of correcting that. In: COH2 Balance