1. "The skill gap is noticeable" - so why bring balance into it? Why would it have ANYTHING to do with balance if this is the case.
2. If you think the high level AT games aren't competitive then you are simply misinformed.
3. This is the exact disposition I was referring to. You want to throw your hands up and say ez mode (like a whiny pussy) then fine. The truth is you can win as allies and you can be just as successful. Is it possible your strategy was poor and this is why you were not able to achieve a victory?
4. What would be an alternative, Soup? Would you prefer the game is balanced for random mode players with no experience?
...
1. what i was saying is that even most AT games, it is scrub mopping.
2. yeah that statement disgusts me. who said that? not me.
3. i'm sorry that while you were rolling with perhaps the best 3v3 at team, you gained a head size of montana, but i don't think i whined. the chart clearly shows that in 4v4 randoms, axis is ezmode. i was just commenting on your big headness.
4. because most AT v. AT is still very one sided, it would produce result as useless as the one right now in terms of trying to use that specific data to balance 3v3+.
alternative? use other forms of data. i.e. how stug, FHQ or CAS does in 3v3+.