Profile of OZtheWiZARD

Yeah, in the past I remember right clicking simply causing my vehicle to move on top of the abandoned target. I've always thought you had to attack ground

It could be that it only works with OKW.

Given that that is just the flip side of just about every post on balance (where we repeatedly get told only 1v1 matters despite that this is the least popular game mode) I can't really blame him

I don't care if there is more 3v3 than 1v1 players. Game is still balanced with 1v1 in mind and frankly I can't imagine being different. 2v2 is where the competitive aspect of the game ends, rest it's only for fun. Besides 80% of loses in so called team games is not due to balance issues but due to having terrible players in your team who doen't even know simple building orders as they never played anything but 3v3, 4v4.
I am not only talking about players being bad in general but also about not knowing and form of strategy and tactics as there is no room for such in large games. There is too much units wondering about to even remotely talk about ambushes and stuff so tactics comes to gathering some units and just straight forward attack on opponents positions hoping for success. When I see coordinated attack in 3v3 game I am well shocked and impressed.

You want to play 3v3? No problem at all just don't expect this mode to be balanced ever besides as I said it before 80% you're loosing due to lack of co operations or player skill differences rather than balance issue.

First of all make sure it's always in range to shoot stuff.
Use the barrage ability on concentration of infantry. ISG will auto fire kind of like a mortar whenever there is an enemy in range. This works well for every support team or defensive emplacement.
You can right click stuff and attack ground as well.

Make sure to retreat the gun when your attack fails so it won't stay there unprotected and easy to flank.

please elaborate. what do you mean by access to every tier, i really dont get it.

overperforming in what sense?

if you mean crappy conscripts scaling, penals that does not provide any value over conscripts, AT guns being the only real non doctrinal anti tank unit yet have only half the dps of paks, su85 comes late and is clumsy to use while being dedicated AT, t34/76 and 85 has no utility skills and escape mechanism despite being heavily dependent on rear shots. guardsmen are evenly matched by upgraded grenadiers and outmatched by all other elite infantry like obersoldaten and fallsshirmjagers despite a hefty upgrade cost and a premium mp cost.

i have no idea what a maxim has to do here either, someone pulls shit out of their ass and decides to derail the thread i suppose, still some of us gave constructive solutions to his woes.

Of course I can elaborate.
By game design decision Soviets have access to only two tiers. All the balance in 1v1 revolves around this. In 2v2 and more you can overcome this by co operation and have access to whole Soviet arsenal. In that regards Soviets are over performing in team games. Half of the topics on this forum is talking about issues with Soviet balance in team games. Scout cars are very potent opening but this can be offset later as there will be no ZiS and Maxims later. In team games that's not the case as you can have scout car opening backed up by Weapon support teams.

Stuka is the same as in larger games there is larger concentration of infantry and therefore every salvo can be far more potent. In 1v1 the cost of getting one allows you to work around it to your advantage as this is 100 fuel that didn't go into armour.

So as I said before: Lets not compromise 1v1 balance due to team games disproportions.

Try to control blobs as Wermaht using MG42 next time and share your opinions.