Profile of Maydream

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 37

General Information


Thread: Panther 3d model27 Aug 2013, 10:00 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2013, 09:56 AMQvazar Nice work! Will you animate the tracks, turret etc? On low poly, yeah! In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Panther 3d model27 Aug 2013, 07:57 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2013, 07:50 AMwuff Do you have a portfolio? I got some works, but never have put them together in a portfolio. If u'r interested, i can upload some of them right here if it's not forbidden. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: SdKfz 222 model finished!27 Aug 2013, 07:49 AM Nicely done! In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Panther 3d model27 Aug 2013, 07:44 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2013, 07:42 AMFreakingFritz thats awesome! are you planning on getting a camo on this panther too? Thanks! Yeah! I'm working on a low poly model right now that I'm gonna texture. I will post it as soon as it's done. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Panther 3d model27 Aug 2013, 07:06 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2013, 06:58 AMwuff That is really nice, you do any professional work? Thanks!! Nah, just a hobby. Got into 3d modelling about half a year ago. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Panther 3d model27 Aug 2013, 06:30 AM Hey guys! Just wanted to show my 3d work inspired by COH2 mighty panther tank. Hope u guys like it! In: Scrap Yard
Thread: My opinion on the units post patch.27 Aug 2013, 06:11 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Aug 2013, 13:23 PMNullist No, all you are getting from me after that post is a spot on my ignore list, and hopefully a warning from moderation. Goodbye. Just like I thought. U r just bad at this game. And the only true thing u want is the "instant win" button. And i'd like to point out that in case SU gets its nerf, t-34 will obviously get buffed eventually followed by ur new crappy posts about how t-34s are op and u always get owned by them unable to win the game by spamming p4's. Correct me if i'm mistaken. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My opinion on the units post patch.26 Aug 2013, 13:09 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Aug 2013, 14:12 PMNullist As I said. Biased Sov rant. Stop trying to pretend, please. I can respond in an equally patrisan fashion how your claims above are incorrect, but the Id be doing what you are as well. You started good, but lost it when the paragraphs began. If you truly are unilateral, post an equivalent section from Ost perspective. I will concede my claim at that point gladly. PS: Whats your Steam ID? I've been looking through some of this forum's threads, and almost in all of them u're the guy who keeps whining and bitching about how soviets are op and stuff. I've really seen a ton of ur snots that can be easily taken as a "biased german rant". Would u be so kind and provide ur steam ID so anyone could take you as a guy who really wants to even things out and not a girl that gets raped everytime she launches this game In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-85; The Thread7 Aug 2013, 05:31 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2013, 14:32 PMMauser Exactly! I feel both factions should have more than one obvious best unit to turn to. (By the way, I said that before the p4 got nerfed.) Then we indeed feel the same (t4 stood for tier 4 building with SU-85 . Btw, I've checked my replays and found our game. It was 500 to 0 on moscow outskirts. No su's were involved Too bad u cant watch the replay having a newer version of the game installed. :/ And you all can applaud me, cuz i haven't built a single t-4 building for at least like 30 games in a row. From time to time it can be tough and even frustrating, but i do manage to win like 70% of these game by taking early advantage. Btw, i clearly remember a wonderful play that became a turning point for me. I was totally dominating the early game having taken both fuel points and most of the map. Feeling pretty confident i went for early su's and built like 2 or 3 of them waiting for their panzers. The funny thing was they never actually came. He was using mostly infantry and anti-tank guns and had totaly outplayed me. That proves alternative strategies do exist and in fact can be extremely effective. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-85; The Thread5 Aug 2013, 12:44 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2013, 14:01 PMMauser You might be right, I just, just wish the stug would be more viable. I am tired of always building p4 if i want to win. I like the p4 but i want to be able to build stugs on maps where i want to be more defensive. I agree that it probably needs a better buff than just a target size decrease, but i am not going to comment on wether the balance actually worked or not, until i have tried it in an actual game. Stug will at least come before the SU-85, giving it some time to vet up. I would like to know exactly what "significantly reduces damage taken" means (this is vet 2 bonus). A vet 2 stug can be quite tough actually and killing a couple of those pesky m3's will help to vet it. It's questions like this that Makes me want to cry that the stat page was taken down. We really need an elaborate coh2 wiki with all the combat stats/commanders/unit stats and costs/bulletin stats etc etc. I just, just wish the stug (T34) would be more viable. I am tired of always building p4 (t4) if i want to win. How do u like that? In: COH2 Balance