Profile of Furyn

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 35

General Information


Thread: Relic should see this2 Sep 2013, 02:23 AM I'm pretty sure those are fake vids too In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic should see this2 Sep 2013, 02:20 AM Nice vids. That first one in particular. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What I view as very pressing issues2 Sep 2013, 02:12 AM I certainly agree with the skill cap argument but it doesn't change the fact that aggressive tank play was almost not existent last patch and it was entirely due to the fact that every basic infantry, on both sides, could reliably 100% of the time deliver an engine crit. From just an enjoyment of the game perspective this was not good. It forced most vehicles into kiting mode and frankly reduced the opportunities for micro. Why push your p4 when you know it's just going to be at-naded to hell if you do. Better to just sit back and snipe a bit. Which of course plays right into the SU-85s hand. My opinion is they needed to do something to allow for aggressive tank play. I'm not all that enamored with RNG engine crits on basic infantry but they needed to do something and it seems this is the approach they came up with. Personally, I'd rather they allow your vehicle to back out of the at-nade range while the animation is going, canceling the ability like COH1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic should see this2 Sep 2013, 01:48 AM I hear you Arac. Let's hope Relic does too. Oh, and don't mind Nullist, he doesn't play Soviets anyway. I do feel that some of the problems are magnified by the types of maps Relic has put together but those are the maps we have so might as well balance to them. Here's to hoping the next patch works wonders. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stuka 50kg bomb?26 Aug 2013, 04:21 AM In 2v2s it's used a lot. Pretty good at gun killer. It's an excellent ability but certainly not OP. Consider it a V1 and act accordingly. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Patch Notes 20/08/201320 Aug 2013, 18:57 PM Fix for point blank range not counting bonus accuracy So, will flanking an MG actually mean something now? I really hope this means close range DPS will go up. Looks like nice changes. In: Lobby
Thread: CoH 2 Update Preview on Relic's Stream!20 Aug 2013, 01:19 AM cool beans. Heads up, you've got an error in the link to Relic's twitch feed. In: News
Thread: SU-85, KV-8, T-70, T-34 Thread13 Aug 2013, 15:20 PM Haha! Op is trolling. Good one. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Reworked Doctrinal system13 Aug 2013, 01:34 AM Actually, it sounds like you would select 6 commanders (2 per doctrine) before hitting the automatch button. Basically it's just the same as COH1 but you have some limited customization within each doctrine. When I heard about the DLC commander system, I assumed this would be the way they would handle it. I didn't realize they'd neuter it so badly. For what it's worth, I like your idea. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Conscripts and Grenadiers28 Jul 2013, 20:40 PM The OP seems to be suggesting that Grens and Conscripts be made more similar by giving Conscripts LMG like upgrades etc. I for one truly enjoyed the diversity between Volks and Rifles in COH1 and would much prefer the two sides in COH2 be as asymmetrical as possible. It makes me sad to see that both core infantry deal the same damage at varying ranges, both have damage engine inducing sticky bombs and yes both gain veterancy in the exact same way. Both infantry also having almost identical DPS upgrades might be just a little too on the nose. Balance does not have to equate sameness. Sameness = bad. Diversity = good. In: COH2 Balance