Profile of UGBEAR

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 954

General Information


Thread: Should Churchills get their 280armor back after price nerf?28 Nov 2015, 17:43 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2015, 17:07 PMSwonVIP It seems like you didnt play that much axis. The churchill is still pretty damn good... cost increase is definitely needed ignoring the fact that OKW now is tax-free? The panther and even a JT is reachable even in 2v2 now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should Churchills get their 280armor back after price nerf?28 Nov 2015, 17:39 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2015, 17:21 PMRupert If there are "glaring holes" then the argument should be in the sake of covering the holes, NOT compensation via other imbalances. 40 armor value IMHO can't be that "imbalances" after the price nerf. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should Churchills get their 280armor back after price nerf?28 Nov 2015, 16:56 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2015, 16:52 PMhhhhh yes thank you, and why do you think it should be nerfed over and over again? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should Churchills get their 280armor back after price nerf?28 Nov 2015, 16:54 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Nov 2015, 16:48 PMSwonVIP no. a very constructive comment. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should Churchills get their 280armor back after price nerf?28 Nov 2015, 16:47 PM Relic is currently busy clubbing the UKF hard, as a only allied faction who could stand toe to toe to the the Aixs late game party, the core late-game unit AKA Churchill have been combo-nerfed hard meanwhile those glaring holes such like AEC/Sexton remain unchanged. I played lots of matches in preview with friends alike, do feel the churchill now is a huge and risky investment and more even so after the OKW became resource tax-free, the OKW panther became the nemesis of those poor Churchills. For me, the fuel cost from 150 to 180 is already dramatic, the old 1600HP is arguably too good for a damage sponge, but perhaps it should gets its 280 armor value back, and make it more resilient to non-uber anti tank guns(AKA pak43, 128mm) and, I do feel all the long nerf list of the UKF might be a little bit rational? Plus, I do think underpowered AEC/Sexton and no projectile for 77HV/17pdr/firefly really needs to be looked at rather than a nerf fest. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Croc price increase too much?28 Nov 2015, 14:32 PM Relic is in a mood of clubbing the Brits meanwhile left all the stupid underpowered stuff like AEC/sexton unchanged and on the top of that the OKW revamp(too much love?), fur Deutschland too much? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to counter sturmtiger27 Nov 2015, 15:43 PM Captured IR halftrack In: Lobby
Thread: OKW Vet Requirement In One Picture24 Nov 2015, 16:06 PM Some of the vets requirement in game is way off. Off-topic,And it's an standard hetzer in the portrait. There for a standard Hetzer inbound(as DLC) In: Lobby
Thread: Should T-34-85 be non doctrinal?23 Nov 2015, 15:59 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2015, 15:57 PMIA3 - HH non-doctrinal T34/85 or KV-1 ?!!! if you say it i say: oh pls relic Tiger should be non-doctrinal for tier 4 Panther and KT perhaps will agree with you In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Should T-34-85 be non doctrinal?23 Nov 2015, 15:47 PM Consider how Relic is revamping, relocating units, redesign, in short, pure all the love into OKW, I do think Soviet needs some love. aye for T-34/85 as non-doctrinal for 1000 years......... it deserves to be non-doctrinal tank, consider how iconic the T-34/85 during ww2 T-34/76 as double/single emergency call-in In: COH2 Gameplay