Profile of cataclaw

Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2013, 09:41 AMSgtBulldog

lol @ korean micro.

Make it 'asian micro' in general?

Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2013, 08:36 AMNullist

When used properly it wins any armor engagement. Period.

Increase to 100 Muni, or reduction to duration, or change to penetration increase are imo all valid options.

Volsky, its ironic that you refer to "vacuum", and then build one sided scenarios that completely neglect what Sov should be doing in them and which represent terrible Sov play.

In your first example of PIV vs ATG, where is your Con ATNade support? Why is your ATG exposed? You expect 1 ATG to counter a PIV?

In your second example, why on earth are you not ramming with 2x T34? Do you not realise that with MT on the PIV, your ramming T34 hits it like a guided missile with a huge warhead attached? The Ram does signficant dmg, and MT increases that too by 50%.

Third example, you are RUNNING UP your Guards to Button? My lols.

Fourth example, "context of team games". MT is even more potent in teamgames where you can bring even more AT to bare for that same 80 Muni cost. Do you not realise that your teammates AT also gets the modifier?

Fifth example, you are FRONTALLY approaching Stugs with your T34s? LOL!

These are your non- vacuum "context"?
Each of them an example of exactly what NOT to do as Sov.

Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2013, 23:43 PMNoun

'Plexy pointed this out when we launched it. It's on a list, but not high priority.

Jump back to quoted post3 Dec 2013, 14:38 PMNullist

Goddam I hate houses. I feel so dirty everytime I go into one.
But I dont have a choice, cos in a fight around one, I have to prevent my opponent from going in, and that means I have to take it first.

Somethinf quite wrong in watching 2 opposing units running side by side, in a race trying to get to the doorway first. Which ofc with Oorah, is a fairly easy thing to win with Cons. I can appreciate that for the Muni cost atleast, dont get me wrong.

But buildings arent fixed yet. Still need more work on these.

I still propose my earlier suggestion of a building cover reduction vs units in 10 range.
Would indirectly simulate "storming" of the building. Something like reduce the Building cover to 30%, such as standard green cover, against units within 10 range, would imo go a long way to helping fix buildings.