Profile of raw

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 644

General Information


Thread: Thoughts about new patch1 May 2014, 10:37 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2014, 08:55 AMdendari_merc I dunno how you missed it but before this patch, pioneer and pgren blobs could indeed ignore cover and run across the field, get on top of soviet inf who stayed in cover but still got cut down by those vicious mp40s,mp44s. Personally, I am loving this patch and am playing germans more than I ever did before because while they do have some great advantages over soviets, (and still are the stronger faction imo) they now have some downsides as well so winning with germans is a lot more satisfying this patch than in the last two patches and so is winning with soviets which is a sign that things are pretty well balanced now edit:- shermans btw do seem a bit too good against both inf and armor and they accelerate really fast but ofc relic will probably only nerf them after the western front expansion comes out germans have no downsides, besides housing a lot of terrible players. the game is far worse than before the patch, just like i predicted, because the rectifying of basic systems is slowly uncovering how retardedly bad the soviet faction has been slapped together by relic. i doubt that much of time pre-THQ-bancruptcy went into them, and they don't belong into a CoH game as is. fortunately(?) we're getting the americans back, so maybe then we can finally start playing the game? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What other people are saying30 Apr 2014, 11:13 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Apr 2014, 09:50 AM__deleted__ damage decrease for all germans units and weapons, we have had a damage increase for all soviet weapons. This means that now every german unit is under performing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: This game is a catastrophe.29 Apr 2014, 19:19 PM Didn't feel like being constructive today. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: This game is a catastrophe.29 Apr 2014, 19:09 PM First I wanted to reiterate how blatantly shit the game is but then I remembered that all topics from the last 2 months are still readable, so why bother? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Please Devs leak us the patch notes !!23 Apr 2014, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2014, 17:13 PMpqumsieh You know nothing John Snow.... In: Lobby
Thread: game is degenerate18 Apr 2014, 09:49 AM proof inside In: Replays
Thread: Should the T-34/85 be available without a doctrine?18 Apr 2014, 07:31 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Apr 2014, 07:20 AMBurts the t-34/85 should of been in T3. T-34/76 should of been the doctrinal tank. Either that or t-34/85 should replace the t-34/76 in the T3 building. I honestly don't understand this game... 44 ostwinds were built, yet they are non doctrinal, a few hundred brummbaars were built. 22000 t-34/85s were built during the war. Yet they are doctrinal and are available only in 3 doctrines. 1300 tigers were built , yet they are present in nearly 1/2 of all german doctrines. Relic is trying a comedy approach to WW2, please bear with them while they're hard at work to make you actually laugh about the punch lines. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Howitzer Balance18 Apr 2014, 07:17 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2014, 15:29 PMSarantini If you look at the overall balance it would make more sense, the German faction has more offmap strikes and many more commanders with recon plane to deal with emplacements and static defenses. I find this a bit funny tbh, because the Soviets have almost no static defenses. Personally, I think their 600 MP costs make them mutually exclusive to winning the game, except maybe in comedy game modes like 3on3+. I'd really like to see howitzers feature in 1on1 engagements, but for that to happen their MP cost must be reduced considerably. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: COMRADES! Do not build T3 or T4. 18 Apr 2014, 06:27 AM Indeed, I never build T3 or T4. Spam Guards into T-34/85 or IS-2 depending on doctrine works best. For one it allows u to get earlier essential soviet pressure on Germans Soviet T3/T4 is not capable of pressuring the OH. The only thing I worry about is kv8s and su 85s, So please no one build su 85s ever and I will always beat you. The only thing SU-85 are good at is blowing up badly played PzIV. If you stop relying on A-Move, Su-85 loose their horror. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Interviews with producers about Western Front 18 Apr 2014, 06:04 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2014, 15:25 PMWhat Doth Life?! "Strategy Informer: Has the community been very supportive of all the previous changes? Greg Wilson: We've talked about this internally a few times but are happy to share it, Company of Heroes 2 is outperforming Company of Heroes over the same time frame. The fans have responded by purchasing and engagement and we work with them regularly. We've got forums and fan-sites, and we're collecting telemetry as Quinn mentioned regarding games as a service. We're using a combination of all these pieces to make informed decisions about where we're heading for the franchise, what content we're adding and why we're adding it, and how it's going to help empower the community to really get engaged. Our ultimate goal with COH is to provide the ultimate WW2 experience. That's what the franchise is all about and that's what we're aiming to deliver." AKA No Games as a service is a terrible idea for RTS. I can see that idea working for MMOs, but not this game. In: Lobby