Profile of PanzerGeneralForever

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1072

General Information
Steam: 76561198060148756
Game Name: PanzerGeneralForever


Thread: Is Wehrmacht Competitive Right Now?2 Aug 2017, 23:58 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Aug 2017, 13:34 PMkarolllus What you have described here is a natural progression of the game stages. Compare that to playing soviets and before you get a tank all your support weapons get wiped by okw stuka xD imagine how salty would you be if that were the case so is ostheer the problem or OKW? I still think all the problems people have with the axis stem from OKW. What you just described is an OKW unit that comes very early. Besides , since when did soviets rely on support weapons other than dshk? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is Wehrmacht Competitive Right Now?2 Aug 2017, 12:29 PM Similar to what everyone has already said, Lose one unit and it can be GG especially if it's your mg42 while they are pushing. I personally live by the half-track and get it 8/10 games I play and put scopes in itbas well. Keeps all your support weapons on the fight and can make for very passive aggressive ostheer play as you slowly move up the map with every engagement you win. Biggest problems ostheer faces: -One wrong move and your support weapons can all turn against you. -this problem is largely fixed by getting a p4 to defend vs flanks are more freely push up. However, once allied TDs hit the field your offenses with your tanks are halted. - problem two is fixed by supporting your p4 with aggressive pak play but is dependent on the map and leads to the third problem. Rocket artillery and indirect fire spam which destroys your support weapons and the back bone of your army. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FBP: M36 Jackson Discussion2 Aug 2017, 00:34 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Aug 2017, 02:23 AMmiragefla 4. Infantry-based AT such as ATGs or Shrecks are its hardest counters. Panthers and StuG Gs end up in the soft counter role since both units combat each other, though they also hardcounter the other two units in the USF Major tier. In a slugfest a StuG G should still win vs the Jackson due to its rate of fire should you close at an odd angle or catch it by surprise. I guess mass mediums could also work depending if the Jackson gets any pricer where it's not cost effective to mass Jacksons against medium tank groups. Of course the issue is distance, but our main thing will likely be adjust the Jackson's accuracy at this point so it's less viable against medium tanks. My personal thing is that I want to improve Panther and PIV but the usual scope locks us out. I tried to get the Panther in as a TD/TH to no avail. Your answer to 4. Is the biggest problem ostheer has right now, especially in team games since Jackson can kite infantry units easily with its mobility. In addition, pgrens are squishy and lose to any infantry once upgraded. They just can't shoot more than once before having to retreat or get wiped, especially with all the rocket artillery and indirect fire flying around. I understand the changes to panther were left out. It's gonna be a rough patch for ostheer tanks imo. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2v2 automatch maps balance feedback [POLL]2 Aug 2017, 00:18 AM Where is EINDHOVEN COUNTRY! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: FBP V1.1 UPDATE31 Jul 2017, 23:12 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2017, 09:10 AMSupremeStefan omg this topic is so stupid so u tell me whats the counter to the elefant with KT pls tell me, 2 jackson is ok ? U want balance between mediums but people sometimes forget how usf is hopeless vs heavy tanks i hope this patch will solve usf late game problems and i dont give garden about poor wermaht because this is myth that wermaht is weak yo Says the man who doesn't play Wehrmacht yo In: Lobby
Thread: FBP V1.1 UPDATE30 Jul 2017, 23:42 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2017, 17:29 PMRedT3rror The Jackson is literally the top of USF AT, then there's nothing for a long time until Bazookas and AT-guns come into play. The JP4 is the counter to the Jackson, however both are tank destroyers and should inflict reasonable damage on each other or else there would be no point in building one or another. If you fear the Jackson becoming OP just compare it to the Firefly. So whats the top of the AT for ostheer? Whats ostheers answer to the jackson? The Firefly is already a problem for ostheer to deal with due to its high accuracy, range, and damage. However, it can be dived far more easily that the jackson because it has half (1.6 opposed to 3) the acceleration and -1.2 the top speed of the jackson making it hard to kite with. Brits also don't have rifles with snares preventing chases. THAT is why the firefly has the standard 640 HP. It also costs more and has a slower rotating turret. Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2017, 17:29 PMRedT3rror The Axis have something called Blitzkrieg or Combat Blitz, both offer tremendous buffs to mobility, survivability and in case of Combat Blitz even accuracy (+100%). Once these units give chase to a 200hp Jackson not even a snare will save you. a 15% top speed boost and 30% increased acceleration aren't what I'd consider "tremendous buffs to mobility. HVAP increases damage AND accuracy which offsets the survivability part o blitzkrieg. Also, since when did 600hp-200 dmg from a tiger/panther = 200hp? In: Lobby
Thread: FBP V1.1 UPDATE30 Jul 2017, 22:54 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2017, 20:51 PMZombiFrancis In FBP, Panthers and Tigers deal 160 damage. So 600-160 = 440hp. The Jackson is the one with the 200 damage shot. He was assuming the Eastern front balance mod where the panther and tiger have 200dmg and I was responding assuming the same. The fact that they dont even do 200dmg just proves my point further. In: Lobby
Thread: FBP V1.1 UPDATE30 Jul 2017, 16:49 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2017, 16:22 PMAlphrum I agree with the jackson having extra hp but wtf, based solely on that its getting 60 range? thats bullshit, at 55 range it can trade with the panther having superior accuracy and 0.75 moving accuracy. "USF cant survive against Okw panther", what the shit did you remove bazookas , at nades and the 57mm AT gun from ur mod? Its funny cuz the ost and okw panther actually have 50 range not 55 so the Jackson could still out range the panther even with 55 range. In: Lobby
Thread: FBP V1.1 UPDATE30 Jul 2017, 16:47 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2017, 10:48 AMRedT3rror And you put it's HP to 600 in order to allow it to be 3-shot by Tigers and Panthers later on, units which the Jackson is actually supposed to counters. This recreates the problem of the Jackson being out of combat after just 1 shot allowing axis heavy tanks free hunting among USF troops. So what's the intended counter to the Jackson if I might ask? According to your previous posts it's not the stug, pIV, PV, JP4, or PVI. What is it? Or is the Jackson supposed to be top of the food chain for a lower price? Also, how does one shot from a panther or Tiger take it out of combat? Last I checked 600hp-200hp= 400hp not 0. Does the Jackson get a main gun disabled at 400hp or something? It also has 10/15 extra range than the tiger and panther while still being faster than both (except slightly slower max speed that panther) meaning it can kite. In: Lobby
Thread: FBP V1.1 UPDATE30 Jul 2017, 05:35 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jul 2017, 19:11 PMVipper Increasing accuracy is not something needed for a "heavy tank hunter" since heavy tanks already have large target size. Increasing accuracy simply make medium tanks like the PzIV obsolete. One has to keep in mind that M36/Su-85/FF not only have very good chances to hit mediums at max range but even get bonus accuracy from veterancy. JP is separate issue since it has lower penetration and OKW luck a 60 range atg. These units should actually have lower accuracy allowing medium tanks to operate and not be completely shutdown by them. I thought these were good changes because it allowed the Jackson to be more easily countered by ostheer which has no 60 range TDs in addition to making it less frustrating to use since it got a health buff and more accuracy (aka less RNG deoendance). It made it more predictable In: Lobby