Profile of GeneralCH

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 419

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Generalch


Thread: Summary of Quinn Duffy's Q&A28 Mar 2013, 06:31 AM Taking more damage and being passive while capping is a gameplay element. You can prevent an enemy from capturing an important sector. Capping in an AOE may be a veterancy or upgrade ability just as taking normal damage for wehr pioneers at vet3. Making passive capping avaiable from the start removes this gameplay element. Imagine someone unknown in the general forums would have suggested, that every squad can cap points and have no penalties while doing that... Maybe i got this wrong and relic has something different in mind. Looking forward to the beta. In: News
Thread: Summary of Quinn Duffy's Q&A27 Mar 2013, 11:13 AM A: There were a few reasons we looked at changing our resource/territory/economy system. First off, the system was pretty punitive. Losing a high point? Punitive. Having your popcap cut off? Punitive. We wanted there to be comebacks in the game - it's all part of the concept of 'Every battle tells a story'. So we tried to design an economic system that is a little more resilient but maintain some connections to the original. We also wanted to focus on tactical play and we wanted it to be easier to make maps. Seems like you didnt understand the core mechanics of this game. Cutting off an enemy from ressources is a tactical gameplay. It has to be seen in regards of Wehr vs. USA, if one faction is pushed back to its base, he can lower the pressure and still come back by capping the enemy ressources behind frontlines. By removing this element the overall gameplay becomes not more varied, but more boring. Thx for all the infos though! In: News
Thread: The Great War 1918 - The Offensive begins23 Mar 2013, 07:18 AM Wow even here is a TGW topic. Seems like they popping out of the ground like mushrooms recently. Would be really great if you guys would stream this mod to make it more popular. My internet connection is just not good enough... (damn you telekom!) GLHF! In: Modding and Tools
Thread: Sniper misfire a bug?13 Mar 2013, 06:42 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Mar 2013, 06:06 AMInverse Yes, snipers have 50% accuracy vs. moving snipers. Thats what i was looking for, thx inverse! That means countering snipers is very luck dependend. Even if you have all tools avaiable (detection + countersniper). However if it should be like that... I mean you tech for a sniper counter and it only works 50%. Imo once you detect a sniper you should always be able to countersnipe if in range. In: COH Central
Thread: Sniper misfire a bug?13 Mar 2013, 06:01 AM Oh i guess i used the wrong term sorry. I meant my sniper fires, but misses, even if the enemy sniper is detected. That is intended? In: COH Central
Thread: Sniper misfire a bug?13 Mar 2013, 04:06 AM Nope. No recloak of the targeted sniper and not out of range. In: COH Central
Thread: Sniper misfire a bug?13 Mar 2013, 02:42 AM Is this a bug or is it intended? Once you detect an enemy sniper, there is a chance to misfire. Im not talking about the retreat modifier or being too close, but about detecting it with a bike/jeep and the attempt to countersnipe. I mean what is the point of the detection of a vehicle if you cannot countersnipe realiably? Misfiring is game deciding, because the enemy sniper can countersnipe you or you loose the bike in the process. For sure you show the enemy where your sniper is, without gaining any profit. This is really annyoing. In: COH Central