Lightning War!
G43 grenadiers, Fast Running, Tiger I, Stuka AT support. nah Jaeger infantry is better. Every single one of those abilities are useful. |
Wow....
OK, on PG's/Stormies at vet3 it's like 3 bars only around range(10-15) it's around 10-25% stronger. So how you don't find how they'r useful is ahh... unfortunate.
|
Okay both katty and pwerfer have minusses to their plusses. Who would have thought.
That was the point he made as well as i did. Please stop the ost up mentality.
Then star reading what people say more carefully. I never said werfer was bad. I said it was lackluster. Something else being better than another doesnt make the other thing bad. And Nothing is perfect. |
You'd need a playercard for that.
But stormjager was able to do it. I though every one could. |
Oh m8 dont get me wrong. I aint saying katy UP, 75killz ez on katy. I'iz saying u mad for complaining about pwerfer.
Hopefully you appreciate me speaking like you so you cab understand me better.
Ok M8. In what way the werfer is perfect. Because I could just as well point out as many "flaws" it has as stated of katty. |
First, veterancy bonuses are a mess yet. Some require serious fixes. But regardless paying or teching for veterancy sound wonky.
CoH had a nice vet differentiation, but it was discarded for CoH2 for a reason. IMO its better as the way it is now. A lot of creativity and elbow grease to balance a game like that is required
I;m guessing coh2 doesn't have a different system for vet for every army is mainly due to streamlining or even a design choice(since global weapon upgrades were also removed). some of the mechanics in coh2 are streamlined compared to coh1 like armor, rec acc. These used target table coh1 and in coh2 they use values this undoubtedly makes things easier to code but makes it difficult(or outright impossible) for unique faction-faction dynamics possible (eg. Puma/up gunned 234 was ok vs light armor but terrible vs us infantry but was a proper all rounder vs brit infantry). |
Why have it? If I have to come up with a reason for not doing it you should need one too. I don't see why grens need it
If you were recommending this for all factions after final tech-up, I might be more interested than for just one faction
Cus T4 sucks. Buffing T4 units would make em hell OP. Getting vet 1 out of the gate at the cost of resources sounds pretty reasonable. It even worked on coh1.
The other factions(i'm putting ukf here too cus they will get fixed eventually) have better early game.
Nostalgia is also 1 more factor (coh1 nostalgia). |
imo the reason why people complain about the katyusha is because they are getting hit by it more often than getting hit by the pwerfer. because you know, they play much more axis than allies. so it is actually based on observation bias, they think katyusha is actually decent when most allied players would salivate at having a rocket arty equivalent to stuka/pwerfer.
it is quite insane that you can complain about such a perfect piece of artillery. it does its job when it hits, they wipes squads consistently and its the perfect tool to destroy infantry in cap points.
compared to that katyusha is a wild card. its great when it hits, just a light show when it spreads and doesnt absolutely nothing, sometimes only a single kill against a 3 gren squads blob. on top of that, the delayed salvo means with quick enough reactions, you can retreat after the 1st salvo hits and watch the other 3 salvo miss their target entirely.
try that with pwerfer and stuka, you'd see your squad getting wiped far more consistently, retreat is only an option when you *hear* the salvo coming, when the salvo hits, its often much too late.
M8, i think your just trash with the katty. |
Wait until you hear female T70 get shot and scream "OH FUCK ME!!!".
I fucking peed from laughing there. |
DPS at what range?
You should really play USF and SOV more. It'd give you a better feel for how those factions play and inform your balance arguments.
Press on my player card and say that again. |