Profile of ZeroZeroNi

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1563

General Information


Thread: Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos4 Jan 2020, 05:08 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2020, 05:03 AMblancat The man who have never played UKF : Bofos is better than light vehicle Bofors shred light vehicles m8. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos4 Jan 2020, 04:49 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2020, 04:31 AMblancat He is better than vonivan i guess ^^ I may not be as cool as the crazy ass VonIvan but what stated was the truth and i replied with another truth. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos4 Jan 2020, 04:46 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2020, 04:30 AMblancat lolololol bofos cant map control Do you know why people use light vehicle? No they can't but it's still a fact. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos4 Jan 2020, 04:44 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2020, 04:21 AMLago ... Are you trying to give VonIvan UKF tips? of course not. but do you think by the time a 2x bren mandos comes along you'll have your 250 alive or be useful. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Incendiary barrage for panzerwer 4 Jan 2020, 04:39 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2020, 22:32 PMMr Carmine Ok denei stats all you want it still does not make a great argument for you. Versitilty you qaintify with type of barrage vet ability and bonusses and aoe profile. As for stats being usseles, "more user friendly" is far more usseles then comparing stats wise. That has even more opinion written all over it. For claiming facts and then stating data is irrelevant to come to your fact is mind bogeling. You seem to have a different defenition of what a fact is. I,ll leave it at that. Don't act all high and mighty. I said the data you want is irrelevant. And listen what points I made require more practical data (real world). Like, %chance of Rocket strike dodged avg hit area wrt range curve avg unit cluster area avg reaction time of attack recipient %chance to hit target with barrage while no doge %chance to hit target with barrage while doge avg damage hit area likely to receive given x number of units %chance to hit clustered target once they have moved from are and a fair bit more. All you are talking about is stuff in theory. but as the saying goes "it's all good in theory, not in practice" All AOE profile will do tell what the dice rolls and numbers are like. It won't tell you stuff in game. And no one has the time to gather stats like these. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos4 Jan 2020, 04:15 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jan 2020, 02:20 AMVonIvan Light vehicles > falls. 251 hf with flamer pio > commandos with brens Good point but, bofor > light vehicles >> 250 ht + flame pios though. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Incendiary barrage for panzerwer 3 Jan 2020, 19:23 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2020, 11:26 AMMr Carmine Cost, hp and armour, speed and mobility, min max range, weapon or rocket damage and aoe profile, how many per salvo, fire time cooldown time, spread or scatter, vet bonusses. Then you look at what type of army they face. All these are meaningless stats. How are supposed to quantify versatility with these data. The answer is your not. If you want to go of in a pointless tangent be my guest. The Fact is the katty is more user friendly and versatile and the stuka simply is more powerful despite both coming sooner(less tech cost associated with them) and on top of that they don't come from tech structures which are kind of a gamble in 1v1 specially. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Incendiary barrage for panzerwer 3 Jan 2020, 08:51 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2020, 05:56 AMMr Carmine Okay still opinion and no data or proof for that matter. Just you stating your opnion, that is a fact. Well what kind of data do you want then? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Incendiary barrage for panzerwer 3 Jan 2020, 05:29 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Jan 2020, 04:19 AMMr Carmine Ok i didnt read carefully enough. That is a fact. But the katty being better is an opnion or sentiment, not a fact. If you want to make it a fact please provide evidence or data. Not just your opnion. the fact was that i said the katty was better it wasn't a sentiment. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Incendiary barrage for panzerwer 3 Jan 2020, 03:50 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jan 2020, 18:08 PMMr Carmine Ok but when you say lackluster isnet bad, thats confusing. Lackluster means its lacking something and have nothing to compensate for that. And that doesnt mean its bad in any degree way shape or form? The sentiment is most definetly katty good and werfer up here. I read correctly. You may not have said it directly but that doesnt change the overall sentiment. OK, Let say There is this place where the burger(/insert your favorite food here) is fantastic. But when you go to other places and try the burger there it doesn't taste as good, may be the salt ain't right maybe the cheese isn't quite as good what ever. That my friend is what is lackluster is. Now, say that you went to a place. You try the burger. And the taste is so poor that you don't to even eat/finish it. That my friend is what is called bad. Hope you now understand that things have spectrum of quality. And you did not read carefully then, I most definitely and directly stated that the katty was better. It's not a sentiment it is a fact. You could argue that stuka > werfer is more of a sentiment. In: COH2 Gameplay