Profile of Strummingbird

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Strummingbird


Thread: (2) Merzdorf22 Apr 2014, 07:14 AM It's a nice map, and definitely different from all the village maps as Akosi pointed out. Some issues though: Base MGs cover most of the point to the east of the northern base. Area to the south of the northern base is very bare as well. The southern base's MG bunkers don't cover a small area at the top left-hand corner. The loading screen has a strange greenish tinge, also visible when the map is tilted down so you can see the horizon. Consider adding some detail to the row of houses outside the playable boundary on the northern edge The concrete walls with yellow cover on one side often lead to units getting stuck when vaulting- see here In: Map Contest 2014
Thread: Heavy armor clash17 Apr 2014, 09:08 AM I'm surprised the little stronghold in the middle survived that long... the whole thing came crumbling finally when 3 tigers rolled in against 2 IS2s. In: Replays
Thread: Next patch predictions16 Apr 2014, 08:08 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Apr 2014, 07:52 AMRocK Всем здравствуйте. У накопилось много вопросов к Канадским разработчикам, на которые я хотел бы олучить ответы: 1. Почему Т34/76 ничего не может противопоставить против Panzer IV? По броне уступает. Вопрос почему, если у него передняя броня сделана под наклоном. Где рекошеты? Почему они не реализованы в игре. Почему Огневая мощь танка такая слабая? Он в лоб четверку не всегда пробивает, хотя должно быть наоборот. Если вы сделали его таким дерьмом, то снизьте на него цену в 200 личного состава, и 40 топлива. 2. Тоже самое качается Т34/85. Где рекошеты? Что ни попадание по передней броне - то пробитие. И какой идиот сделал его таким дорогим в у последнего командира. С какой стати он стоит 130 топлива? Пантера которая В РАЗЫ лучше и по огневой мощи и по бране стоит всего навсего на 10 топлива дороже. Т34/85 максимум цена по бензину должна составлять 70-80 топлива, и никаких там 130. 3. Почему ИС2 только в двух доктринах? У Немцев Тигр почти в каждой второй доктрине, а у советов ИС2 только в двух? Тоже самое касается Т34/85. Этот танк вообще должен быть в основе, и никак не в доктрине. 8. Почему в последнем патче жостко порезали Штурмовую пехоту с ППШ? Их в данном патче инженеры с огреметами сносят за раз. 9. Почему КВ1 и КВ2 в игре сделаны в доктрине? Это танки 1941 года, с какой стати они в доктрине? Если так, и танки 1941 года сделаны в доктрине, то закиньте в доктрину Панзер4 и Пантеру. Поставьте на Основу Панзер III и Панзер IV с короткой пушкой. Вы вообще знаете значения слово "БАЛАНС"? Если в Канаде не знают значения этого слова, то я могу Вам объяснить что это такое. T-34/76 is worth much, much more than 200MP and 40F, even if it is inferior to the Panzer IV, and the T34/85 is not worth 80 fuel either. The Panther costs much more manpower than the '85, even if the fuel costs aren't vastly different, and more importantly you have to tech for the Panther as opposed to the '85. Either way they'll be changed substantially, apparently, next patch, so just sit tight and wait. Why is the IS2 present in so few doctrines? Good question, actually, I've wondered that myself. As for the KV1 and KV2 being doctrinal and not buildable, it's just the way it is, as much as I would like them to be part of the base faction, subject to balance tweaks. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The Angry Bears - Recruitment16 Apr 2014, 03:00 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Apr 2014, 20:59 PMNapalm Bears support each other. In: Lobby
Thread: A 4v4 in a ruined city14 Apr 2014, 10:36 AM Fun game, GGWP to Marcus, Sturmpanther, Lifer, Pheenyx, Priest, Peter, and Kluge's AI In: Replays
Thread: Conscript-conscript-conscript IS212 Apr 2014, 05:26 AM A replay in which combined arms and unit diversity is defeated by spam. DISCLAIMER In: Replays
Thread: New Soviet Commander on the way!!!10 Apr 2014, 17:51 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2014, 17:43 PMgary.giles71 I do find the whining about DLC a bit much. They provide the battle servers for you to play on FOR FREE! No one is asking you to buy them ... I haven't. People win without them. If a good one pops up that peaks my interest ... I might throw them a bone ... It just might keep the battle servers free. Some athletes win without doping, and they aren't technically forced to take drugs, but it's still an undeniable unfair advantage - and those that don't dope have to work harder for the same result. Same goes with the old Soviet Industry and Elite Troops, both old and new versions. If Relic had charged for battle servers it would have been an absolute disgrace, with or without free commanders. In: Lobby
Thread: New Soviet Commander on the way!!!10 Apr 2014, 00:25 AM Looks like what the NKVD commander should've been from the start... In: Lobby
Thread: Next patch predictions9 Apr 2014, 05:44 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2014, 04:54 AMTNrg If this also applies to AT guns they might become pretty useless. They already miss quite a bit of shots at near max range, and if they receive less penetration at long ranges chances are that they don't penetrate even if they manage to hit. It should be reasonable to expect different AT weapons receiving different penetration modifiers at different ranges. AT guns could retain high penetration throughout while T34s could get more falloff further away and ramp up faster when closing the distance, for example. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The Theatre of History2 Apr 2014, 08:06 AM This. In: Lobby