Profile of Strummingbird

emplacements are tech progression fr brits

Wrong- out of three emplacements, two are unlocked by tech in the same way that any unit is unlocked.

going for that unlock, means you HAVE to rely on it.

Wrong- in the same way that building T2 as Wehr doesn't mean you have to build any units from it.

Anvil tactics from Brit T2 does nothing except 1. Unlock the Bofors, and 2. Lock the AEC. It isn't a forced tech path, necessary to progress further down the tech tree, nor does it cost any significant amount of resources (negligible MP and Fuel cost), since the cost is in the Bofors itself. It is not a meaningful opportunity cost in any shape nor form.

Comparing the paltry 10 fuel for Anvil to the unadjusted 80 fuel for the Schwerer Panzer HQ, and saying both affect tech decisions and gameplay progression into the mid-late game in the same way, is beyond ignorant.

check preview

I have. It's still very good, something you would know had you checked the preview yourself.

Total nonsense

Do you expect to just build a ton of MP units, fail to put any thought into planning your build, then complain that you run out of MP at the 5-8 minute mark to build a potentially game-winning emplacement? Or do you take horrifically bad engagements and bleed MP out the nose instead of retreating? Either way, you can't expect people to take you seriously.

Also, saying that an immobile emplacement cannot win you the game? I'd like to quote someone you might know:

Churchills arent that good

Wrong.

and they literally feed veterancy to AT units

Like every other vehicle in the game? Churchill gives away vet slower than a Tiger does anyway, on account of near identical armor and much lower cost, let alone any medium tank.

And no, a churchill cant engage a panther lol, panther outranges it and is much faster.

In the same way that a Puma will beat an IS2, being faster and outranging it? As I said to the other guy, go ingame and test it out.

It takes just shy of a one and a half minutes of continuous firing, on average, for a Panther to destroy an AFK churchill at max range. For perspective, that's enough time for an AVRE to fire three times and complete two reload cycles.

Panther is way faster, has greatgreat armor and has better range, so how slow Churchill can engage Panther and kill it?

Churchill will never kill a Panther, but the Panther likewise will never kill a Churchill unless your opponent leaves to get himself a coffee in the interim. practically speaking it works out in favour of the generalist tank, since you win the infantry war and thus map control. It's hard to fully explain, but it's very clear in an actual game.

its more expensive than an ostwind right?

Marginally more, 320MP vs 280Mp iirc. Same fuel cost.

Not sure what to think of the Centaur, it's very slow and will always die if caught out of position, but also extremely lethal, way more than is reasonable for cost. Some degree of equalization would be preferable I think.

Which one is wasp?

The Wasp is the Universal Carrier with the 90 munition flamethrower upgrade.

Would like to report that Elite Riflemen still spawn with Vet 2, even with the mod. Elefant tooltip still shows it taking up 25 pop, but it seems like it uses 19, as stated in the patch/mod notes. ISU, Tiger, and other call-in vehicles which had population changed have not been tested, but checking the tooltips for those units might be warranted. I'm wrong, disregard

Lastly, infantry flamers seem thoroughly underwhelming with the mod, against units in the open, in cover, and importantly in garrisons. Units in houses can reliably beat dedicated flamethrower infantry. Some medium between the strength of live-version flamers and this mod's flamethrower strength should be reached.