Profile of Bulgakov

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 987

General Information
Steam: 76561198061121041


Thread: Why this game is almost balanced14 Jun 2014, 10:45 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2014, 10:26 AMdasheepeh i want to punch your balls so hard.. you talk about soviet whiners yet all you do is whining about soviets and only trying to buff germans. you dont see a single balance issue with the germans that the soviets might have (negative for soviets). im getting so sick of it.. Look at what you wrote. Stop polluting the forum, write politely. And if you're so sick of people being unobjective, pls give us a list of your own posts where you complain about soviet units being OP. I agree with OP. He's not saying the Scout car is an automatic game winner. But it has a huge effect on the game despite being first tier and low priced. The hard counters come much later and require teching and they arrive after their own hard counter is on the field (ATG/Guards) The main point is, it's not fun to play against I quit for 2 months recently because of this and maxims. I'm guessing I'm not the only one. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M3s on Semoisky What to do?13 Jun 2014, 21:34 PM Remove M3 from T1, we don't need a transport light armoured unit that can house flamers with MG front and back right at the start of the game. MG42 is very flankable with cons and molotovs, why do we need something that drives through everything wiping squads? Why make 222 more expensive? It requires teching. M3 does not. I have M3s more than ISU. ISU only ruins late game, M£ ruins the whole start if every damn game. In: Replays
Thread: Remember the Flammenwurfer?13 Jun 2014, 18:04 PM I was glad when the Flammenwerfer was nerfed. It was killing everything on retreat and making the game less fun for both sides (unless you enjoy easy wins). I play mostly Germans btw but still I wouldn't like this unit to be brought back the way it was. I think it's great you have to wait 'til T3 for the upgrade. It makes early game infantry play possible instead of having to desperately rush for the counter to a unit that can take away the whole map from you as well as half your units. Deploy Flammenwerfer and cue Benny Hill music :/ On the other hand the soviet have a T1 flammenwerfer in the form of M3. I think this should be nerfed to extinction too. Squad-wiping units shouldn't be around in t1. I think flammenwerfer should be banned from HT like sniper and units shouldn't be able to fire from HTs that are moving. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Deselelcted maps being selected13 Jun 2014, 17:57 PM Thanks for the replies! After the game finished I saw my vetoes were in place. When they disappear pre-game, they don't reappear post-game. So this is happening even with vetoes in place. WiFiDi - so this is intentional? I'd rather wait 30 minutes than play Kharkov D: In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Deselelcted maps being selected13 Jun 2014, 17:05 PM I never want to play some of the maps. SOmetimes they are selected despite being deselected. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Dshk armor penetrating rounds13 Jun 2014, 16:16 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 11:12 AMKatitof Never ever use AP rounds on DSHK. The only armored targets they were good against were -1.5 armor infantry -caches Everything else could effortlessly back away. Meanwhile, MG42 incendiary rounds will shred anything below T-70 in one-two bursts(talking light armor here you angry fanboys). Please provide a replay of both a DSHK and an MG42 attacking light vehicles. Make it in a custom match so both weapons attack the same vehicle and make them attack the vehiles of both armies. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: combat engineers13 Jun 2014, 16:15 PM Dear Admins, Please make a note of the makers of suchs threads. There are at least 4 forum members who routinely make such threads and unpleasant aggressive comments. I'm not asking for the though police to lock everything down. But it would be nice if you could "motivate" such people to speak to other members with some decency. Otherwise they taint every thread and make it unreadable. I can't enjoy my coffee while reading this, don't make me go back to gamereplays or relic forums pls. for teh love of god plsss. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do you guys enjoy the vehicle-centric meta?13 Jun 2014, 16:08 PM I agree we need to tone down some of the vehicle's deadliness against infantry. and it'd be interesting to remove the one-at-a-time idea for super tanks. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Let's talk Coh2 - Community13 Jun 2014, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2014, 09:46 AMFrikadelleXXL I want to see you Rambo guys in real life, I bet you wrote this while getting some sandwiches from your mother. You're complaining about other people trolling (which to be honest we could all do without) but look at what you wrote. Accusing other posters of lacking manliness and bringing their mothers into the conversation. Glass houses, stones, etc. Of all the people on the forum, I notice your posts are the most aggressive. You fill them with smileys to mask it but your message is always "lol, fanboy, deal with it " I think it's likely you're somehow provoking the other players either by what you say or by abusing the most annoying units. If this isn't the case, just ignore them. If they're raging when they lost fair and square, why even bother reading it? on another point you made about no new players entering the game, I think it's more likely it's because of retarded units like ISU, Elefant, m3 halftracks, etc. I would never recommend this ame to a friend just because of the annoying gameplay. But if they fixed those issues I would recommend it to any friend who plays games. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Speed and Cost of Call-Ins Vehicles12 Jun 2014, 00:20 AM +1 but I think delay is better than more expensive. As it is, if you go for an elephant or Tiger you're gonna be waiting a loooong time after that to get a new PIV. In: Lobby