Profile of PaRaNo1a

The aim of the german invasion was not to anihilate russians. How comes that the french, danes, norvegians, were not anihilated?

So you want to say that German soldiers who were talking about it in documentaries are lying?

The next time you'll hear Obama talking about pre-emptive attacks remember that the germans did that for the first time in history against the soviets. The comunists were about to "liberate" Europe from the evil capitalists and Germany was forced to attack first.

Did you just tried to justify Hitlers intentions about the invasion to Russia?

Which is why the german snipers fire faster

The german mortar fires faster

The rifle grenades have longer range


On a sidenote, Paranoia and other pro-MG42 buff people: Can you post a comment on the cast I posted? The german player used 2 MG42s in that match and they both seemed to work just fine.

Because we are talking about 1 MG42 not 2....
I haven`t seen the cast (I am at work atm and Youtube is blocked =(.)
But if the players uses 2 MG42 together in a same area to supress the same blob, then its either you are trolling us or don`t get the point of what an MG42 should be.

On a side note. Why soviets got 2 models for a sniper? and Why they got the Sprint ability?
Why soviet mortars have precision stike?
Why molotovs do periodic damage?
I can ask you same dumb questions all night, cause your questions are dumb, if you can clarify wtf do you mean by your questions.

Sure, it might happen. But thats all situationally. Maybe a little bit more consistency would do the whole game good.

Regarding MG-42: I think its good enough. The AP-Rounds are great. Deals a whoooole lot of damage.

We dont care about the Damage output of the MG, all we ask is a little suppression buff. Why people constantly try to avoid that fact and find other reasons why MG42 is good. Sure its good when the soviet player is retarded and just stands in the arc out of cover. But the fact that Maxim can suppress faster ruins everything. I mean if grens had the oorah ability fine I get it, it should suppress faster so you could call it somehow a balance. But Relic believes that cons should have ooorah and their maxim should suppress faster grens who don`t really have any ability except the doctrinal to run faster. Second of all stop with the discussion about molotov and riflenade. Most of the time the nade doesn`t kill shit but just takes some hp from the squad. And if you say otherwise then I don`t know how the fck you throw the nade. Molotovs though do periodic damage if you look at the fact that the MG 42 needs shitloads of time to move out of the fire then its technically retarded. But riflenade and molotovs are another topic I suppose.
Fact is a fact MG 42 needs a slight suppression buff everything else can stay the same. I will leave dushka out of the topic because that HMG is for soviets who go full retard. Although I agree that its easy to counter with a vet 3 mortar =)

Then you don't play against good players. Against anyone decent a lone Maxim is a delaying action at best until two grens/a 221/PGrens chase it off the field. Hell, a gren squad in reliable heavy cover/a building can almost slug it out against it, and definitely wins if a riflenade is involved. And of course the rapid-fire mortar is very effective against a Maxim, and a sniper is useful too. There are many tools that can take out a Maxim as soon as it comes out (provided it comes after a few conscripts). If your opponent rushes them, laugh, cap around him and gives him a taste of FHT.

Because dodging a riflenade is hard. The fact is you need more than 2 grens to counter a maxim, while to counter an MG42 you only need 1 squad with molotov =)

Me