Profile of NaOCl

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 378

General Information
Last Visit Time: 22 May 2024, 07:57 AM


Thread: Move Conscripts 7th man from t4 to t3?16 Jun 2019, 17:35 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2019, 22:01 PMKatitof Was it up to me, it would be T3 unlock with side cost of 20-30 fuel associated. Good thing nothing is up to you. Doesn't need that kind of nerf. T3 would be optimal, but T4 at least contributes other things and its built in most games. A T3 sidetech of 20-30 FU would not dramatically increase timing (~1-2 mins assuming equal fuel control and no caches) all whilst simultaneously delaying T4. What a terrible and unnecessary idea. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T49 Jun 2019, 16:42 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2019, 12:15 PMLago Y'all know this is crazy, right? The T3 T-70 is already so strong it appears in almost every SOV game. The T-34/76... ...is only 20 MP 20 FU more expensive. ...has twice the armour. ...has 260 more HP. ...has twice the penetration. ...is similarly brutal against infantry. ...fires three times slower but at four times the damage. Think this through, people. 75 FU of teching is what makes the difference between Mobile Defence being the sole meta and being on the junk heap of doctrines. You'll break the game if you stick the T-34/76 in T3. Make a T3.5 then, as others have suggested. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T49 Jun 2019, 11:48 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2019, 11:44 AMMr Carmine I see your point. But what role would the t70 need to fill? Scouting? Other then that i can not think of anything else. It's cheaper, faster an more maneuverable. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T49 Jun 2019, 02:06 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2019, 09:26 AMAarotron If you put 85 into base tech, what would you even use to replace originaö slots in commanders? Kv 1s? Even more kv 8s? As in the original post, any will do an ISU-152. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WEHR:- Fix "Close Air Support" (CAS) doctrine8 Jun 2019, 02:30 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2019, 15:48 PMWingZero I do think the commander needs to be reworked as its not popular in 1 v 1 or 2 v 2 but can be cancer in 3 v 3 and 4 v 4 where fuel and ammo points are locked in. That could be fixed in a rework In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SOV: Move T-34/76 to T3 and make T-34/85 non-doc/T47 Jun 2019, 17:09 PM As is title, T-34/76 should not come later than PzIV. The T-34/86 would be a good replacement and should be non-doctrinal. Replace the T-34/85 that are doctrinal with the ISU-152 as in is only in 1 doc. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WEHR:- Fix "Close Air Support" (CAS) doctrine7 Jun 2019, 15:37 PM Most of the effects hare sub par In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Veteran Squad leader upgrade weapon poll7 Jun 2019, 15:00 PM Mp40 or stg, pref mp40 to differ from OKW. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW - Replace Sturmtiger in elite armor doctrine7 Jun 2019, 14:58 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2019, 13:00 PMdasheepeh my experience with sturmtiger as okw in my games is as follows: - i move up the sturmtiger to the front - can't land an effective shot at reasonable micro cost because enemy units casually move out of the way - i get frustrated This is my experience, and hitting british emplacements and not knocking them out. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW - Replace Sturmtiger in elite armor doctrine7 Jun 2019, 05:50 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2019, 00:05 AMClarity Obviously those shouldn't be allowed to stack Or, should they? In: COH2 Gameplay