Profile of ddd

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 528 | Subs: 1

General Information
Website: https://www.coh2.org/ladders/playercard/steamid/76561198058464077
Steam: 76561198058464077


Thread: Re-balance Allied TDs penetration values27 Oct 2019, 20:17 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Oct 2019, 19:53 PMLago No, we just don't see balancing the game as a contest between each person's pet faction. You clearly do, else you wouldn't have brought up the completely non-sequitur Pershing that has nothing to do with this discussion. Or maybe you are just too emotional, calm down. You want to standardise tank destroyers when heavy tanks are getting changes to differentiate them more. That makes 0 sense. And since you seem to be a huge fan of my faction usage, i played 99% axis this last month, hope you are happy about it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Re-balance Allied TDs penetration values27 Oct 2019, 19:50 PM You are asking for standardisation just after they nerfed armor on pershing to 270 for no good reason. Are these threads about discussing real game changes that can be realisticaly applied or just trolling? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Re-balance Allied TDs penetration values27 Oct 2019, 19:02 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Oct 2019, 18:51 PMLago I fail to see what this has to do with the penetration on tank destroyers. If they have have the same penetration, it's easier to balance enemy armour values around it. Personally, I think tying penetration to veterancy is a bad idea in the first place. You fail to see how durable tanks with super high armor and HP on one side force tank destroyers with high penetration and range on other side? Great, you are just like relic who thought giving usf shit tanks and forcing them to use things like p47 loiter to deal with armor was a good idea. Thankfuly we moved on from that genius design philosophy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Re-balance Allied TDs penetration values27 Oct 2019, 17:39 PM Standardise nondoctrinal tanks selection too. Give usf something similar to comet, churchill or panther non doc. If you are so smart go all the way. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is USF cluster bomb too unbalanced now?25 Oct 2019, 08:15 AM Cluster bombs are fine but fragmentation bombing is broken. It comes almost instantly near map edges. Needs more delay. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Replace the Bulldozer Attachment with the 10523 Oct 2019, 16:49 PM Except there is one winner (75mm) and nobody ever bothers with other variants (76, e8, 105). So much for "advantages". P4 ausf j (the okw one) saw some use in current tournament with new ostheer doctrine. Now thats doctrinal medium tank worth taking into consideration. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on World Championship 2019 so far?23 Oct 2019, 15:41 PM I was watching multiple streams during tournament and every usf game was lost except voivans games. And despite all the crying on this forum, ostheer was picked very often with great results, there were even underdog stories like bulat vs noggano. Ofc noggano lost with usf against ost. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Replace the Bulldozer Attachment with the 10523 Oct 2019, 15:09 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2019, 15:08 PMLago I like the Sherman 76 though. It's a really nice middle ground between a Sherman and a Jackson. You like it only because you didnt play usf in months, you probably forgot what this unit does. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on World Championship 2019 so far?23 Oct 2019, 15:06 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2019, 15:06 PMHon3ynuts Is that a real stat? Oh its real son. Its real. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on World Championship 2019 so far?23 Oct 2019, 15:04 PM Ostheer: 80% winrate USF: 10% winrate I think ostheer needs some heavy nerfs, panzergrenadiers need to be delayed and ability to skip tech structures removed. Their units got buffed to ridiculous level, there is no excuse to keep tech skipping anymore. In: COH2 Balance